High Court of Karnataka Decides Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification
3 Dec 2015...
Search Results for "lease income"
855 result(s) found
Found 855 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Considers Criminal Appeal in Disproportionate Assets Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act. Appellant Challenges Conviction Alleging Miscalculation of Income and Improper Sanction Under Sections 13(1)(e) and 13(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
28 Jun 2024The appellant, a former Electrical Attender in the Public Works Department, was convicted by the trial court under Section 13(1)(e) read with Section ...
- 10
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Enemy Property Tax Exemption Case — Property Tax Levyable on Lessee Despite Union Ownership. Article 285(2) of Constitution Enables Municipal Corporation to Impose Property Tax on Lessee of Union Property Even if Union Itself is Exempt Under Article 285(1).
22 Feb 2024The present civil appeal arises from a judgment of the Allahabad High Court which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondent-assessee, holding th...
- 182
High Court
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Land Grant Application Without Auction. Petitioner's claim of arbitrary rejection due to prior complaints not substantiated; court upholds requirement of auction under Communidade rules.
27 Oct 2023The petitioner, Shri Arvind G. Shirodkar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an order dated 09.01.2014 passed by th...
- 47
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant Cooperative Housing Society's Appeal in Land Allotment Dispute — Upholds Trial Court's Dismissal of Suit for Declaration and Injunction. The Court held that the appellant failed to establish any legal right to the land as the resolution for allotment was subsequently revoked and no concluded contract was proved.
13 Dec 2013The appellant, Atchutanand Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., filed a suit seeking declaration of its right to land admeasuring 1,14,000 square metres...
- 72
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.
10 Jan 2023The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...
- 342
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises when findings are based on appreciation of evidence and not perverse.
30 Nov -0001The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the first appellate court which con...
- 84
High Court
Bombay High Court pronounces judgment on Letters Patent appeals in oppression and mismanagement case under Companies Act, 1956 — dispute over diversion of Contship agency business. The Court examined whether directors' diversion of business opportunity amounted to oppression and breach of fiduciary duty under Sections 397, 398 of the Companies Act, 1956 and Section 88 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882.
31 Mar 2006The appeals arose from a dispute between the Puri Group and the Sippy Group, both holding equal shares and equal directorships in two private Indian s...
- 13
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Waqf Tribunal Decree for Possession of Waqf Property. Defendants' claim of adverse possession fails as Waqf property is not subject to adverse possession under Section 107 of the Waqf Act, 1995.
25 Feb 2014The case involves a civil revision application filed by the original defendants (petitioners) against the decree passed by the Maharashtra Waqf Tribun...
- 99
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.
11 May 2012The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...
- 66
