Search Results for "intervener"

266 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 266 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC — Cause of Action Disclosed. Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because Judge Thinks Plaintiff May Not Succeed; Defence Not Material at This Stage.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Private Complaints for Dishonour of Cheque Over Rs. 1 Crore Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Section 142(2) of NI Act Does Not Mandate Police Investigation, Private Complaint Maintainable.

The case involved a reference made by a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court regarding the interpretation of Section 142(2) of the Negotiable...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.

The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeal on Excise Duty Exemption for Cotton Fabrics Produced by Cooperative Society. Interpretation of Exemption Notifications under Rule 8 of Central Excises and Salt Act, 1944 at Issue.

The appellant, a textile dealer in Bombay, entered into an agreement with a registered cooperative society for weaving cotton fabrics on powerlooms ow...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision and Restores Rejection of Plaint in Suit Based on Unregistered Agreement. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Fails as Agreement Not Produced and Suit Time-Barred Under Article 58 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a Civil Revision Application filed by Ajmera Enterprises (the applicant) against an order of the appellate court which had set aside...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Duplicate Warehouse Receipts Against Maharashtra State Warehousing Corporation. Refusal to Issue Duplicate Receipts on Ground That Originals Are Not Lost but in Possession of Third Party Is Arbitrary and Violative of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, M/s. Ruchi Global Limited, purchased cotton bales from M/s. Baba Sai Corporation and deposited them in the warehouse of the Maharashtr...