Search Results for "fraudulent misrepresentation"

404 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 404 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Rejects Second Bail Application in Economic Offence Case Due to No Change in Circumstances. Applicant's Role as Director in Fraudulent Transactions Upheld; Gravity of Offence Precludes Bail.

The applicant, Waryam Singh Kartar Singh, filed a second bail application under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, in connection wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Partition Suit — Limitation and Res Judicata Cannot Be Decided Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC Without Trial

The appellants, who were the plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Software Implementation Dispute. Section 11(6) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 invoked due to respondent's failure to appoint arbitrator under agreement dated 30 October 2015.

The applicant, SAP India Private Limited, filed an application under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Leave India Notice by Australian Employee over Alleged Violation of Natural Justice and FRRO's Jurisdiction. Employment Visa Grant by High Commission Not Subject to FRRO's Nullification, Argues Petitioner.

The writ petition was filed by an Australian citizen, who held an Employment Visa (E-2) valid from 08.01.2018 to 07.01.2020, after being appointed as ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Validity of Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple Administration to Ramachandrapura Mutt. Petitioners Allege Violation of Rights as Registered Trust and Seek Restoration of Previous Board of Trustees Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution.

Multiple writ petitions and writ appeals were filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru challenging Government Order No. KAM.E.56 MU.A.B. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Partition Appeal in Co-owner Dispute — Rejects Adverse Possession Claim. Court holds that a co-owner cannot claim adverse possession against another co-owner without ouster, and a suit for partition is not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a family dispute over property originally owned by M.A. Mohammed Ayoob. The appellant, Mohammed Hussain, filed a suit for partition ...