Search Results for "discretionary grant"

1821 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1821 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for declaration and injunction dismissed as plaintiffs failed to prove title and possession over suit property.

The case involves a Regular Second Appeal filed under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated 20.02.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Trial Court’s Order Allowing Prosecution to Examine Witnesses Under Section 311 CrPC After Evidence Closure and Section 313 Examination

The case involved two Criminal Writ Petitions filed by accused persons challenging an order of the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, dated 27 Sep...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Enhanced Share Valuation, Awards Interest at 6% Pre-Decree and 9% Post-Decree in Decades-Old Dispute. Balancing Equity and Commercial Realities: SC Modifies Interest Rates in Rajasthan State Mines Share Acquisition Case

Valuation of Shares – The Supreme Court affirmed the High Court’s valuation of shares at ₹640 per share, rejecting the State’s objections. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession.

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by the original plaintiffs (appellants) against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Latur, dismissi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings on Possession and Title. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title and possession over suit property, and that the suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Sri B.S. Lakshman, filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Coastal Regulation Zone Notification for Versova Mangroves — No Violation of CRZ Norms Found. Court held that the impugned notification dated 18.01.2019 was issued after due consideration of all relevant factors and did not violate the CRZ Notification, 2011.

The present Public Interest Litigation was filed by 14 petitioners, including residents of Versova, Mumbai, and the Jai Bharat Cooperative Housing Soc...