Search Results for "discovery statement"

1348 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1348 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Laxman Baban Waghe and Ramu @ Ramdas Budhya Waghe, original accused Nos. 3 and 4, were convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Pronounces Oral Judgment in Cross Appeals Involving Kidnapping, Murder, and Conspiracy Under IPC Sections 364-A, 302, 120-B, 201/34. Both State and Accused Filed Appeals Against Trial Court Conviction and Sentence, With the Accused Challenging the Sufficiency of Circumstantial Evidence.

The present matter concerns two criminal appeals arising from the judgment and order dated 30.11.2018 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Infanticide Case — Life Imprisonment Confirmed for Mother Who Threw Newborn into Well.

The appellant, Kanchan Vilas Kumbhar, was convicted by the III Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, in Sessions Case No.96 of 2003 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 498-A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Santosh Balu Mali, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of his wife Suman, under Sections 302, 201, and 498-A of the Indian ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory and Recovery of Articles Confirm Guilt Under Sections 302, 364, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Channappa @ Channu @ Channya Gangannawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge at Margao for the murder of Renuka, the wife o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Circumstantial Evidence Case — Death Due to Sudden Quarrel, Not Premeditated Murder. Conviction under Section 302/34 IPC converted to Section 304 Part I IPC as the incident arose from a sudden fight without premeditation.

The case arises from the death of a person whose dead body was found on 3.2.1997 in the verandah of a shop. The appellants, Suresh Chandra Tiwari and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence and Appeal in Familial Homicide – Accused Claims Exception Under Section 300 IPC for Grave and Sudden Provocation Based on Alleged Impotency Remarks.

The case arose from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Solapur under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Delivers Common Judgment in Criminal Appeals Against Conviction in Murder Case Under Section 374(2) CrPC. Appeals Challenge Conviction by Special Court for Bomb Blast Cases Arising Out of Crime No.121 of 2002 for Murder of Venkatesan on 08.05.2002 at Thali.

These criminal appeals were filed under Section 374(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, against the conviction and sentence imposed by the Spe...