Search Results for "detention order quashed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "detention order quashed"

1138 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1138 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Consideration of Bail Conditions and In-Camera Statements Not Affecting Public Order. The court held that failure to consider bail conditions and lack of public order disturbance in in-camera statements renders the detention order invalid under Section 3(2) of the MPDA Act.

4 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Paras Rajendra Apte, challenged his detention order dated 09.04.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Yavatmal under Section 3(2) of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes MPDA Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that the live link between the detenu's alleged prejudicial activity and the preventive detention order was broken due to an unexplained delay of four months from the date of arrest and three months from the grant of bail.

15 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Shivkumar Madeshwaran Devendra, brother-in-law of the detenu Manoj Tangraj Devendra, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay of 5 Months. Failure to Comply with Section 3(3) Requirement of Forthwith Approval and Delay in Considering Representation Renders Detention Invalid.

15 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Sachin Parshuram Mane, challenged an order of detention dated 30.06.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

3 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Detaining Authority Failed to Consider All Grounds of Detention. Single Case in Paragraph 4(a) Considered, Paragraph 5 Ignored, Vitiated Order.

22 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Suman Sudhakar Jadhav, mother of the detenu Ganesh Sudhakar Jadhav @ Kalya Ganya, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Const...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in MPDA Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Lack of Material to Show Prejudice to Public Order. Preventive detention under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981 set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's bail application and did not adequately link the alleged activities to disturbance of public order.

11 Aug 2015

The petitioner, Rashid @ Jagga Shaukat Hussein Sayyed, challenged a preventive detention order dated 22 September 2014 passed by the Commissioner of P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Challenging COFEPOSA Detention Orders on Grounds of Constructive Res Judicata. Fresh Grounds Must Be Raised in Earlier Petitions or Are Barred.

1 Aug 2014

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders of detention passed under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 for Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Petitioner Was on Bail and Could Be Prosecuted Under Regular Law, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

1 Dec 2011

The petitioner, Santosh Tukaram Chavan, was detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Demurrage and Wharfage Charges by Port Trust — Holds Customs Detention Not Attributable to Exporter for Demurrage Liability. The court quashed the demand for demurrage and wharfage charges against the exporter and directed the Customs authorities to pay the amount to the Port Trust.

29 Mar 2006

The petitioners, Vidyt Metallics Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition challenging the orders dated 17.12.1998 and 29.12.1998 and the demand dated 8...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Representation and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's representation dated 7-9-2004 was not considered by the detaining authority, and the detention order disclosed total non-application of mind.

12 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Sanpreet Kaur Tejpal Singh, wife of the detenu Tejpal Mann Singh, challenged the detention order dated 6-2-2004 passed by respondent N...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)