Search Results for "credit facility"

536 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 536 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Accused No. 3 for Dishonestly Receiving Stolen Gold Bars in Bank Fraud Case. Court holds that possession of stolen property soon after theft, coupled with lack of explanation, is sufficient for conviction under Section 411 IPC.

The case pertains to a large-scale bank fraud involving forged Telegraphic Transfers (TTs) amounting to Rs. 6,70,00,000/- at Vijaya Bank, Nasik Branch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Allows Appeal Against Exclusion of Personal Guarantors from CoC in CIRP of Corporate Debtor — Re-constitution of Committee of Creditors Set Aside. Personal Guarantors Are Not Members of Committee of Creditors Under Section 21(2) of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

The National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) heard an appeal against an order of the Adjudicating Authority (NCLT, Chandigarh Bench) dated 01.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of IGST on Exports Under Protest, Rejects Unjust Enrichment Claim. Payment under protest does not attract doctrine of unjust enrichment under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.

The petitioner, Venus Jewel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, challenging the refusa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Retrospective Amendment to Foreign Trade Policy and Customs Notification. Court Holds That Importers Have No Vested Right in Export Obligation Period and Retrospective Amendment Is Valid to Prevent Misuse of Duty Exemption Scheme.

The Bombay High Court dismissed two writ petitions challenging the validity of Notification No.2(RE 2013)/2009-14 dated 18th April 2013, which retrosp...