Search Results for "composite consideration"

958 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 958 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Government Order Handing Over Mahabaleshwara Temple to Ramachandrapura Mutt. The Court Examines Validity of Revenue Department's Order Under Bombay Public Trust Act and Constitutional Provisions.

The matter involved a batch of writ petitions and writ appeals filed before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, including Writ Petition No.30609...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Revision Case for Lack of Proper Inquiry. Commissioner's order under Section 263 set aside as no inquiry was conducted before passing the revision order.

The appeal by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, challenged the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal which had set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Recovery Suit, Sets Aside Decree Due to Non-Production of Best Evidence. Adverse Inference Drawn Under Section 114(g) of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 Against Plaintiff Who Failed to Produce Written Agreement and Delivery Challans.

The appellant, Karnataka State Agro Corn Products Ltd., a Government of Karnataka undertaking, was the defendant in a suit for recovery of money filed...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Suit for Redemption of Pledged Securities After Loan Default; Plaintiffs Abandoned Main Claim of Transfer Agreement. Pledge Agreement Clause 14(ii) Notice and Default by Pledgor Form Core of Dispute Over Shares of Sesa Sterlite.

The suit was filed by Harinarayan G. Bajaj and others against Reliance Capital Limited and Sesa Sterlite Limited. Plaintiffs borrowed a total of Rs.10...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...