Search Results for "closing date"

936 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 936 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Revisional Order Allowing Liquor Licence in Village Where Women's Gramsabha Resolution Banned Liquor — Held That Gramsabha Resolution Under Section 138 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949 Must Be Given Due Weight and Cannot Be Ignored by Revisional Authority.

The petitioners, residents of Village Chas (kaman), Taluka Khed, Dist. Pune, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Hears Appeal Against Conviction Under Sections 307 and 325 IPC in Water Dispute Assault Case. Conviction Stems from Incident Where Victim Suffered Severe Head Injuries Allegedly Caused by Spade and Stick.

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, in Sessions Case No. 118 of 1993, where the two appellants were convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Allegations of Demand for Gold and Silver Articles Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 304-B IPC.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 19th April 1995 passed by the 2nd Additional Sessions Judge, Osmanabad in Sessi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Goonda Act in Favor of Detenue's Wife Due to Procedural Violations. Preventive Detention Invalid for Failure to Follow Section 8 Safeguards and Provide Effective Representation Under Article 22(5).

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by Smt. B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Refund of Rs.27.51 Crore Collected Under Coercion in GST Investigation — Mandamus Issued for Unlawful Recovery Without Adjudication. Court Holds That Recovery Without Adjudication Is Illegal and Violative of Article 265, and Directs Refund With Interest.

The petitioner, M/s. Bundl Technologies Private Limited, a company engaged in e-commerce, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...