Search Results for "bid validity"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "bid validity"

335 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 335 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Package Tendering System for Road Works. Policy Decision to Reintroduce Package System Upheld as Valid Executive Action Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.

21 Jan 2025

The case involves a batch of writ petitions filed by individual contractors challenging the Government Order G.O.(Ms) No.162, Highways & Minor Ports (...

Tribunals

NCLAT Upholds Sale of Corporate Debtor as Going Concern in Liquidation — Confirms Immunity Under Section 32A IBC. Liquidator's Application for Confirmation of Sale and Immunity Allowed Despite Objections from Suspended Directors.

27 Sep 2024

The appeal arose from a common order dated 27.09.2024 passed by the NCLT, Chennai, in IA(IBC)/415/2024, IA(IBC)/1701/2023, and IA(IBC)/1757/2023 in th...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision: BOT Scheme Agreements Classified as Leases, Rejects Claims of Legitimate Expectation and Promissory Estoppel. In a landmark ruling, the Supreme Court affirms that Build, Operate & Transfer (BOT) agreements for toll collection fall under the definition of a lease, dismissing appeals challenging legislative amendments and executive assurances.

19 Jul 2024

Petitions decided by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, questioning whether a Build, Operate & Transfer (BOT) Scheme agreement, where the right to ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Direction for Tender Process in Government Procurement Under National AYUSH Mission. The court held that paragraph 4(vi)(b) of the Operational Guidelines requires a transparent tendering process among eligible establishments, including IMPCL, Public Sector Undertakings, state government pharmacies, and cooperatives, to ensure competition and quality in the procurement of Ayurvedic medicines.

3 Jan 2023

The dispute arose from a petition filed by Kerala Ayurvedic Co-operative Society Limited before the Lucknow Bench of the High Court of Judicature at A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Case Upholding Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The Court Held That Res Judicata Cannot Be Determined in an Order 7 Rule 11 Application as It Requires Examination of Previous Suit Records Beyond Plaint Averments Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

9 Aug 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing a revision petition against an order of the Trial Court that rejected an ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Disinvestment of BPCL and Repeal of Burmah Shell Act — Strategic Disinvestment Policy Not Subject to Legislative Mandate for Prior Parliamentary Approval. The court held that the executive is competent to decide disinvestment under Article 73, and the repeal of the Burmah Shell Act by Finance Act 2016 is valid, with no right of first refusal for employees or dealers.

12 Nov 2020

The judgment concerns four petitions challenging the Union of India's decision to disinvest its shareholding in Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited (...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes CVC Order Divesting CBI Director of Powers — Rule of Law and Institutional Independence Upheld. The court held that the CVC exceeded its powers under Section 8(1)(a) and 8(1)(b) of the CVC Act, 2003 read with Section 4(1) of the DSPE Act, 1946, and that the orders were invalid as they undermined the independence of the CBI Director.

8 Jan 2019

The judgment arises from two writ petitions challenging the legality of three orders dated 23rd October 2018. The first order was passed by the Centra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Against Partnership Firm and Guarantors. SARFAESI Act Section 13(2) Notice Validly Issued Against Principal Borrower and Guarantors, and Section 17 Application Before DRT Is the Appropriate Remedy.

28 Jul 2016

The petitioners, M/s. Otoklin Global Business (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Dhaval Dilip Jhaveri, filed a writ petition under Article 226 o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act, 1996, Setting Aside Part of Arbitral Award for Being Contrary to Public Policy. Court holds that arbitrator cannot award interest on interest (compound interest) unless specifically agreed, and that claims barred by limitation cannot be awarded.

29 Jul 2015

The petitioner, Rajesh Pravinchandra Rajyagor, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Refusal of Permission for Sale of Trust Property Under Section 36 of Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The Court Held That the Charity Commissioner's Refusal Was Justified as the Trust Failed to Show Urgent Necessity or Benefit to the Trust.

21 Dec 2005

The judgment concerns two writ petitions challenging a common order dated 19.4.2005 passed by the Charity Commissioner, Pune, refusing permission unde...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)