KAHC010366622012_1
21 Jun 2016...
Search Results for "Void Order"
5061 result(s) found
Found 5061 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Division Bench Order in AIADMK Internal Dispute — Interim Injunction Denied for Party Meetings. Court holds that temporary injunction in political party affairs requires strict compliance with CPC principles and balance of convenience.
27 Sep 2022The Supreme Court disposed of a batch of appeals arising from interim orders in civil suits concerning the internal management of the All India Anna D...
- 161
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Adjudicates Lapsing of Land Acquisition for BDA Scheme; Examines Applicability of Section 24(2) of 2013 Act and Section 27 of BDA Act
27 Apr 2018The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru was seized of multiple writ petitions concerning land bearing Sy.No.103 of Nagarabhavi Village, measuring fou...
- 32
High Court
Karnataka High Court Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Constitutionality of Karnataka Hindu Religious Institutions and Charitable Endowments (Amendment) Act, 2011. Petitioners Seek to Strike Down Act as Discriminatory and Violative of Fundamental Rights.
17 Nov 2015This batch of writ petitions was instituted by several temple trusts from Uttara Kannada and Belgaum districts of Karnataka before the Dharwad Bench o...
- 51
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Dismissal of Arbitration Suit for Non-Compliance of Court Order. Petitioner Failed to Pay Costs as Directed, Leading to Dismissal Under Order IX Rule 8 CPC.
2 Jun 2015The petitioner, M/s Crompton Greaves Ltd., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 2...
- 72
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Judicial Immunity and IBC Proceedings as Abuse of Process. Challenge to Section 3 of Judges (Protection) Act, 1985 and Section 7 of IBC held to be frivolous and not maintainable.
20 Dec 2024The petitioner, Mrs. Manisha Nimesh Mehta, as promoter and guarantor of M/s. Perfect Infraengineers Ltd., filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Cou...
- 287
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Forfeiture of Property Under SAFEMA Despite Revocation of Detention Order. Property of Detenu Forfeited Under Sections 7 and 19(1) of SAFEMA Upheld as Detention Order Was Valid When Forfeiture Order Was Passed.
11 Mar 2005The petitioner, Smt. Padma Nirmal Agarwal, challenged the forfeiture of a flat (Flat No.16, 471/C, Manu Mahal, King's Circle, Mumbai) under the Smuggl...
- 195
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Bombay Tenancy Act Case — Certificate of Purchase Under Section 32M Cannot Be Challenged After 9 Years. The Court Held That the Certificate Is Conclusive and the Landlord Cannot Seek Termination of Tenancy After the Tenant Has Purchased the Land.
10 Jan 2012The case involves a dispute under the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Land Act, 1948 regarding agricultural land bearing Gat No. 98 in village Tilleha...
- 119
High Court
- 46
High Court
- 40
