Search Results for "Section 363"

867 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 867 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of Minor under POCSO Act and IPC. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory Sufficient to Sustain Conviction and Death Penalty in Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the confirmation of the death sentence awarded to Atul Rama Lote by the Special Judge (POCSO), Thane, for the rape and murder of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Murder, Kidnapping, and Unnatural Offense Case. Circumstantial evidence including last seen together and recovery of body at instance of accused sufficient to prove guilt under Sections 302, 363, 377, 201 IPC.

The appellant, Vaibhav Shantaram More, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Sewree, Mumbai, for offenses under Sections 363, 377, 302, and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Kidnappers for Ransom and Attempt to Murder in Minor Boy Abduction Case. Appellants convicted under Sections 363, 364A, 307, 120B IPC and Section 4 of the Maharashtra Control of Organised Crime Act, 1999 for kidnapping a minor for ransom and throwing him into a well.

The case involves two appeals filed by Bhagwan Gajanan Phandat and Madhao Ravindra Kapade against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Restores Conviction for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Under POCSO Act Despite Victim's Consent and Cohabitation. Consent of a Minor Is Irrelevant for Offences Under the POCSO Act and Section 376 IPC, and the High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction by Acquitting Based on Such Consent.

The Supreme Court of India dealt with a suo motu writ petition and a criminal appeal arising from a judgment of the Calcutta High Court. The backgroun...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Nagpur Bench Delivers Judgment on Appeals Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC and Against Acquittal in Murder Case. The appeals, arising from a neighbor dispute, involve questions of common intention and credibility of eyewitnesses.

The case involves two criminal appeals arising from the trial court's judgment in Sessions Case No.11 of 2016. The prosecution alleged that on 3.11.20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 364, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dhananjay Janardhan Yadav, was convicted by the V Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the kidnapping and murder of his five-y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 363 and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Barkya @ Vishwas Ananda Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Islampur, for the murder of a 12-year-old boy, Kuldeep, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Infanticide Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Inconsistencies. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for murder of newborn set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kamlabai Tukaram Gharat, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad-Alibaug in Sessions Case No.83 of 1994 for the offence ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Kidnapping and Rape of Minor Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 363, 366(A), 376(2)(i) IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Maula s/o Babu Kotwal, was convicted by the Special Judge, Osmanabad in Special (POCSO) Case No.21 of 2015 for offences under Sections ...