Search Results for "Section 33(3)"

418 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 418 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death but Grants Probation to Young Offender. Concurrent findings of guilt under Section 304-A IPC and Motor Vehicles Act not perverse; benefit of Probation of Offenders Act extended considering age and first-time offence.

The petitioner, who was 18 years old at the time of the incident, was convicted by the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aurangabad, for offences under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Did Not Form Complete Chain.

The appellant, Kishor alias Bajrang s/o Mukundrao Ramteke, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nagpur for the murder of his mother under Section 302 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Relinquishment Deed Executed by Karta in Joint Hindu Family Property Case. Relinquishment deed executed by eldest male member as Karta is valid and binding on minor coparceners, and suit for declaration filed beyond limitation period is barred.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1994 by four younger sons of late M.C. Rudrappa seeking a declaration that a relinquishment deed dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Incomplete Chain of Circumstances. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mahesh Vasant Chilwante, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge-3, Osmanabad, in Sessions Case No.21/2015 for offences punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Claim Petition Beyond Limitation in Motor Accident Case — Tribunal Has Power to Entertain Delayed Claim After Omission of Section 166(3). The Court held that the omission of Section 166(3) does not affect pending claims and the Tribunal retains inherent power to condone delay.

The petitioner, Kum. Jyoti Manohar Shetye, a socially engaged citizen employed with the Bombay Port Trust, participated in a bicycle ride from Mumbai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Abatement and Condonation of Delay in Second Appeal — No Sufficient Cause Shown for 5-Year Delay in Filing Application After Dismissal of Appeal for Default.

The case involves a civil application filed by Smt. Radhabai Vithal Waikar (the applicant) seeking to quash an order dated 1st March 2006 passed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Acquits Accused in Police Assault Case Due to Unreliable Testimony. Conviction under Section 332 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Chhalasingh s/o Kishansing Chavan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar, for an offence under Section 332 of th...