Search Results for "Sarla Verma multiplier"

850 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 850 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Upholds Compensation for Deceased Motorcyclist. No Contributory Negligence Found as Maruti Car Driver Was Solely Negligent, and Compensation Based on Income Tax Returns and Multiplier of 10 Was Proper.

The case arises from a motor accident on 7th August 1994, when Rajendra, the deceased, was riding a Hero Honda motorcycle and was hit by a Maruti car ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Awarded to Family of Deceased Engineering Student Upheld. Tribunal's Assessment of Notional Income at Rs. 3,000 per Month and Multiplier of 18 Found Just and Proper Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The present appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 12/02/2007 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased pedestrian held 50% contributorily negligent for crossing highway without care; insurer's liability reduced proportionately under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal heirs of a deceased pedestrian against the owner and insurer of a truck. The accident o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Compensation Case — Future Prospects Awardable in Permanent Disablement Cases. Loss of earning capacity must consider functional disability and actual income, not merely physical disability percentage.

The appellant, Pappu Deo Yadav, was a 20-year-old data entry operator earning ₹12,000 per month when he suffered a serious motor accident on 18.05.2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appellate Court Cannot Routinely Enhance Compensation Without Claimant's Appeal or Cross-Objections in Motor Accident Claims. Enhancement Permissible Only in Manifestly Unjust Awards Under Section 168 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The case arises from a First Appeal under the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, filed by United India Insurance Co Ltd against an award of the Motor Accident ...