Search Results for "Prevention of Corruption Act"

461 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 461 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Madhukar Nagnathrao Bandale, was a Junior Clerk in Upper Painganga Project, Sub-Division No.3, Isapur. The complainant, Ganpat Kasture ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constables in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Hostile Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals by police constables convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for demanding and accepting a bribe. The com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Invalid Sanction and Insufficient Evidence. Failure to Obtain Valid Sanction Under Section 6 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947 Renders Trial Void and Conviction Unsustainable.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of the appellants under Sections 5(1)(e) read with 5(2) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 194...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Deorao Marotrao Bhagatkar, was the Principal of Kendriya Vidyalaya, Chandrapur. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Chandrapur, in S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Constable in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shrikrushna s/o Janardhan Chaudhari, was a Police Constable attached to Akot Police Station. On 15.1.1993, he along with other constabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Demand and Acceptance Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Gopal Wasudeo Gulhane, a Senior Clerk in the Office of Deputy Director of Vocational Education & Training, Amravati, was convicted by t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Complainant's Revision and State's Revision Against Discharge of Accused in Corruption Case. Prima Facie Evidence of Bribe Demand and Acceptance Sufficient to Frame Charges Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The case involves two criminal revision applications arising from an order of the Special Judge, Bhandara, discharging the accused Kunda Motiramji Bod...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Proof of Demand. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Nivrutti s/o Ganpati Sadekar, was a Junior Assistant in the Education Department of Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad. The complainant, Balaji...