Search Results for "Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act"

349 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 349 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in SAFEMA Forfeiture Case — Notice to Convict Not Mandatory When Property Held by Relatives. The Court held that proceedings against relatives under Section 6 of SAFEMA are independent and do not require prior notice to the convict.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against a Madras High Court judgment that had set aside forfeiture orders under the Smugglers and Foreign Exc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment of Bank Account in GST Case — Attachment Without Show Cause Notice Violates Principles of Natural Justice. Section 83(1) of CGST Act, 2017 Requires Prior Notice and Opportunity of Hearing Before Attachment.

The petitioner, Kaish Impex Private Limited, a company engaged in the export of perfumes and compound fragrance oil and registered under the Goods and...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Review Committee for MCOCA Cases — No Statutory Basis for Review Committee Under MCOCA. Court held that MCOCA does not provide for a Review Committee and directions given in Kartar Singh for TADA cannot be imported into MCOCA.

The petitioner, Vijay Anant Vashirde, was an accused in MCOC Special Case No.6 of 2009 under the Maharashtra Control of Organized Crime Act, 1999 (MCO...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Service Tax on Renting of Immovable Property for Warehousing and Storage. Levy of Service Tax Under Section 65(105)(zzzz) of Finance Act, 1994 on Renting of Immovable Property for Commercial Use is Valid and Constitutional.

The petitioners, including Tulsidas Khimji Warehousing Pvt. Ltd. and others, filed writ petitions challenging the levy of service tax on renting of im...