Search Results for "Income Tax Act, 1922"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Income Tax Act, 1922"

286 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 286 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Director of Mines in CBI Case Alleging Criminal Conspiracy and Abuse of Official Position — Held That No Prima Facie Case Made Out for Framing of Charges Under IPC and PC Act. Reconstitution of Partnership Firm Does Not Require Transfer Permission Under Rule 37 of Mineral Concession Rules, 1960; Bonafide Administrative Decision Protected Under Section 27 of Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.

7 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M.E. Shivalingamurthy, the former Director of Mines and Geology of Karnataka, against the High Court's o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Delivers Judgment in Motor Accident Claim Appeal Involving Air Force Sergeant Paralyzed in Road Accident. Tribunal's Dismissal of Claim Based on Lack of Complainant's Complaint and Criminal Charge Sheet Challenged.

21 Sep 2021

The appellant, a former Sergeant in the Indian Air Force, sustained grievous injuries in a road traffic accident on 03.02.2007, resulting in 100% disa...

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Removes Interim Application and Treats Guardianship Petition as One under Clause XVII of Letters Patent. Disposal of Interim Application No. 1768 of 2025 on 24 April 2025 Leads to Removal from Board.

8 May 2025

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay, presided over by Justice Abhay Ahuja, took up Guardianship Petition No. 8 of 2025 along with Interim Applicati...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Conviction in Kidnapping for Ransom Case Due to Non-Proving of Essential Ingredients. The Court held that Section 364A IPC requires proof of threat to cause death or hurt or conduct giving rise to reasonable apprehension, which was not established by the prosecution, leading to acquittal.

28 Jun 2021

The appeal arose from a criminal case where the accused was convicted under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for kidnapping a school stude...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Quashing and Bail Applications in PMLA Case. Court upholds Special Court's orders extending judicial custody and rejecting bail, applying twin conditions under Section 45 PMLA.

16 Mar 2021

The case arises from an FIR (Crime No.109 of 2020) lodged by Mahendra S. Surana, a Director of M/s. Aurangabad Gymkhana Club Private Limited, against ...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quo Warranto Petition Against Panchayat Member for Holding Office of Profit. Respondent No. 3 Disqualified Under Section 12(1)(d) of Goa Panchayat Raj Act, 1994 for Being a Government Contractor.

23 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Mrs. Zarina Blanca Fernandes, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of quo warranto agai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge the burden of proving the execution and validity of the agreement to sell, and the suit was barred by limitation under Article 54 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

2 Apr 2024

The appellant, Zainab Rafiullah Shaikh, was the original defendant No.3 in a suit for specific performance filed by the respondent, Puthenveedu Joseph...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Application to Declare Arbitral Award Satisfied as Vexatious and Dilatory. Unilateral Deposit of Disputed Amount Without Decree-Holder's Consent Does Not Discharge Judgment-Debtor Under Section 31 CPC.

13 Mar 2018

The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL), the unsuccessful respondent in an ar...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

7 Aug 2018

The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)