High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Writ Petition in Labour Matter. Order Reserved on 24 April 2025.
24 Apr 2025...
Search Results for "Full wages"
1722 result(s) found
Found 1722 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of Employee Without Domestic Inquiry or Retrenchment Compensation Held Illegal Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.
5 Dec 2023The petitioner, Mutha Founders Pvt Ltd, challenged the judgment and order dated 05.11.2012 passed by the learned Industrial Court, Satara in Complaint...
- 28
High Court
KAHC030058022017_1
13 Jul 2023A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by workmen of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporati...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Letters Patent Appeal Against Single Judge's Order in Retrenchment Dispute, Examining Scope of Industrial Tribunal's Jurisdiction. Key Issues Include Whether Tribunal Could Determine Legality Under Section 25F When Reference Limited to Justifiability of Retrenchment.
9 Mar 2005The appeal arose from an industrial dispute concerning the retrenchment of seven workmen by M/s DBH International Ltd., a clearing and forwarding agen...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Court in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Under MRTU & PULP Act. The petition challenged the order directing reinstatement and backwages on grounds of lack of jurisdiction and violation of natural justice.
17 Oct 2025The writ petition challenged the order dated 28/02/2025 passed by the Industrial Court, Maharashtra at Jalna in Complaint ULP No. 225/2019. The Indust...
- 19
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Retrenchment Case. Termination of Probationer Without Notice or Compensation Under Section 25-F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal as Employer Failed to Prove Unsatisfactory Work.
1 Sep 2006The Petitioner, M/s R. Nawroji & Co., a partnership firm running a printing press, appointed the First Respondent, Francis E. Lobo, as a Machine Opera...
- 108
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Teacher Due to Procedural Lapses in Departmental Enquiry under MEPS Act. Non-payment of subsistence allowance and failure to follow statutory enquiry procedure vitiated the termination, violating principles of natural justice under MEPS Rules, 1981.
20 Mar 2015The matter concerned a challenge by a secondary school teacher to his termination by the management of a private school. The teacher was appointed on ...
- 68
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Challenge to Show Cause Notices and Demand Letters Issued by Grocery Markets and Shops Board Against Hazardous Chemical Manufacturer. Court Issues Rule on Ground that Procedure Under Section 28(2) of Maharashtra Mathadi Hamal and other Manual Workers (Regulation of Employment and Welfare) Act, 1969 Appeared Not Fulfilled for Scheme Notifications to Have Effect.
29 Sep 2022The writ petition before the Bombay High Court arose from a dispute between a hazardous chemical manufacturing company and the Grocery Markets and Sho...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Writ Petition Challenging Termination for Unauthorized Absence and Misconduct. School Tribunal's order upheld as inquiry was fair and punishment proportionate under MEPS Act.
26 Aug 2022The petitioner, Abdul Shakil Shakil Ahamad, was employed as a Peon in 1989 and later promoted to Junior Clerk. He alleged that he was paid a meager co...
- 50
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Compromise Terms Binding on Parties. The court upheld the Industrial Court's issuance of a Recovery Certificate under Section 50 of the MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, based on a compromise between the employer and employee, rejecting the employer's contention of non-compliance by the employee.
26 Mar 2014The petitioner, Adarsh Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its liquidator, challenged an order dated 16 October 1998 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai,...
- 109
