Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against Admission of Insolvenc...
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting I...

Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

492 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 492 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Bank's Appeal in Insolvency Case — Holds Dispute Predominantly Contractual, Not a Straightforward Financial Debt Default Under IBC. The Court ruled that where loan disbursement is made directly to a builder under a quadripartite agreement and the corporate debtor's obligations are intertwined with the builder's performance, the transaction does not constitute a simple financial debt under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016.

7 May 2026

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by Dhanlaxmi Bank Limited against the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Polluter Pays Principle in Tannery Pollution Case — Directs Comprehensive Compensation and Remediation for Environmental Degradation in Vellore District. The court affirmed that tanneries are strictly liable for ecological damage and health impacts, and the Loss of Ecology Authority's compensation assessment must be enforced with government backup liability.

13 Feb 2025

The Supreme Court of India delivered a landmark judgment addressing the severe environmental degradation caused by tannery industries in Vellore Distr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Air India Disinvestment and Transfer of Employees. Transfer of undertaking under Section 25FF of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 does not require consent of workmen and continuity of service is protected.

13 Mar 2023

The petitioners, three trade unions representing employees of Air India and its subsidiaries, filed writ petitions challenging the disinvestment of Ai...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Against Bank Forfeiture — Directs Refund of Rs.24.10 Lakhs Deposit with Interest. Forfeiture of deposit without contractual authority in auction sale is arbitrary and unjust, warranting refund with interest at 6% per annum.

20 Apr 2022

The petitioner, P Balaji Babu, participated in an auction conducted by the State Bank of India (respondent No.1) for the sale of immovable property ow...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Tax Deduction at Source on Guarantee Money Paid to Non-Resident Cricket Boards for Matches Played in India. Income from matches held in India is deemed to accrue in India under Section 9(1)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, attracting TDS under Section 194E.

29 Apr 2020

The case concerns an appeal by PILCOM (PAK-INDO-LANKA JOINT MANAGEMENT COMMITTEE), a committee formed by the cricket boards of Pakistan, India, and Sr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Borrower's Challenge to Sale Certificate and Award in Cooperative Bank Loan Recovery — Upholds Validity of Sale to Third Party Purchaser. The Court held that the sale certificate issued under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 cannot be challenged after a long delay and that the purchaser's title is protected.

8 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Mahesh Navelkar (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), was a borrower who took a loan of ₹9,500,000 from the Goa State Co-ope...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

8 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Demand Against Mutual Fund Under Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act — Holds That Beneficiaries of Securitization Trust Are Not Liable for Trust's Tax Demand. Section 177(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 does not impose joint and several liability on beneficiaries of a securitization trust for the trust's tax dues when the trust is assessed as a separate entity and the beneficiary holds only pass-through certificates.

6 Mar 2013

The petitioner, UTI Mutual Fund, is a registered mutual fund under SEBI regulations. It invested in a securitization trust called Indian Corporate Loa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Securitisation Act Notice Against Tenant in Possession of Mortgaged Property. Petitioner failed to establish independent right or title over the secured asset, and the notice under Section 13(2) of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 was validly served.

20 Mar 2006

The case involves a writ petition filed by Ms. Yukta Mookhey against the Bank of India and others. The background is that Harmonics Fabrics Fashions L...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Against SARFAESI Proceedings by DBS Bank — Foreign Bank Not Required to Register Under Section 2(1)(c) of SARFAESI Act for Enforcement of Security Interest. The court held that a foreign bank with a branch in India is a 'bank' under Section 2(1)(c) read with the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and can enforce security interest under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment involves two writ petitions: Writ Petition No. 1338 of 2016 filed by Narendra Plastic Private Limited and Neemit Punamiya against DBS Ban...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)