Search Results for "Alternate Remedies"

408 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 408 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No-Confidence Motion Against Trust Office Bearers. Scheme of Administration Does Not Prohibit No-Confidence Motion; Resolution Valid Under Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950.

The petitioners, Lakhichand Marotrao Dhoble and Kisangopal Chunnilalji Gandhi, were the Chairman and Treasurer respectively of a public trust named Sh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Eviction Decree in Tenant's Writ Petition — Bonafide Need of Landlord Established. Landlord's requirement for business expansion and settling sons held genuine under Section 16(1)(g) of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the tenant (petitioner) challenging the decree for eviction passed by the appellate court under Section 34 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL's Petition Challenging Ombudsman's Order to Provide New Connection Without Recovery of Previous Dues. Auction Purchaser Not Liable for Previous Owner's Electricity Arrears Under Electricity Act, 2003.

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Limited (MSEDCL) filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Electricity Ombudsman, Nagpu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Cess Demand Against Small Scale Unit in MIDC Area for Lack of Jurisdiction. NMMC Cannot Levy Cess on Industrial Premises Outside Its Municipal Limits Under Section 127 of the Bombay Provincial Municipal Corporations Act, 1949.

The petitioners, M/s Sargam Foods Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged the order dated 29th November 2007 passed by the Cess Officer of the Navi Mum...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rebate of Education Cess on Exported Goods in Central Excise Matter — Education Cess Held to Be Part of Excise Duty for Rebate Purposes Under Rule 18 of Central Excise Rules, 2002 and Section 37B of Central Excise Act, 1944.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by M/s Ispat Industries Limited challenging an order dated 30 November 2004 passed by the Deputy Commiss...