Search Results for "Acquittal"

6999 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 6999 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Failure to Prove Presence at Scene. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish appellant's presence near time of death and relied solely on Section 106 Evidence Act without foundational facts.

The appellant, Sunil s/o Latari Khuje, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur for the murder of his wife, Panchafula, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Upholds Acquittal in Customs Act Case — No Evidence of Intent to Evade Duty. Foreign Currency Seizure Not Sufficient to Prove Offence Under Section 135(1)(c)(ii) of Customs Act, 1962 Without Proof of Mens Rea.

The case arises from an appeal by the Union of India against the acquittal of the respondent, Harish Muljimal Gandhi, by the Chief Judicial Magistrate...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Police Sub-Inspector and Private Individual in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

The appellants, Jawansingh Ramsingh Gaud (a Sub-Inspector of Police) and Umesh Manohar Ambre (a private individual), were convicted by the Special Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 307 IPC read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shambabu Lathujisingh Yadav, was convicted by the Assistant Sessions Judge for Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.790 of 2011 for an of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Complainant and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Vinod s/o Savalaram Kanadkhedkar, was a junior clerk in the Tahsil office, Nanded. He was convicted by the Special Judge, Nanded in Spe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Intent and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Death Caused by Accidental Fall, Not Intentional Act.

The appellant, Gautam Bhagwan Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule, under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellants, Vitthal Tukaram Kadam and his son Somnath Vitthal Kadam, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, for the murder of Lal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) and Section 12 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as sole trap witness was a stock witness and evidence lacked corroboration.

The case involves two appeals against conviction under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The appellant Gopal Gadhave (accused no.1) was convicte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not corroborated by medical evidence or independent witnesses.

The appellant, Vishnu Hari Khopkar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Vasai, for the murder of his wife Aruna under Section 302 IPC and ...