CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012
29 Jan 2016...
Search Results for "taxing officer"
518 result(s) found
Found 518 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Consolidated Writ Petitions Challenging Forest Development Tax Notification Under Karnataka Forest Act. Petitioners Contended That the Levy on Mineral-Bearing Land Violated Article 246, Entry 54 of Union List, and Forest Conservation Act, 1980.
3 Dec 2015The High Court of Karnataka, Bengaluru, heard a batch of writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by several minin...
- 69
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sales Tax Incentive Scheme Withdrawal — No Promissory Estoppel Against Policy Change in Public Interest. The court held that the withdrawal of a general sales tax incentive scheme by the State Government was valid and not violative of promissory estoppel or legitimate expectation.
30 Nov -0001The judgment involves three writ petitions filed by industrial units (M/s. Vidarbha Winding Wires Ltd., M/s. Chandrapur Vidyut Conductors Private Ltd....
- 100
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Against Entertainment Tax Imposition on Fashion Week Event. Petitioner failed to avail alternative remedy and did not cooperate with assessment proceedings under Karnataka Entertainment Tax Act, 1958.
30 Jan 2018The petitioner, M/s. Dream Merchants Events and Entertainment Groups, organized a 'Bangalore Fashion Week' event on 03.02.2012 at Hotel Crown Plaza. T...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Forest Development Tax on Mining Leases Under Karnataka Forest Act, 1963; Constitutional Validity of Section 98A and Notification Examined. The petitioners contended that the notification dated 16.08.2008 and demand of forest development tax from holders of mining leases in forest areas were repugnant to the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 and ultra vires the State's legislative competence.
3 Dec 2015A batch of writ petitions was filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various entities inc...
- 73
High Court
Bombay High Court Deliberates on Applicability of Limitation Act to Appeals Before Collector Under Section 137 of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949. Issue Centered on Whether Collector is a 'Court' for the Purpose of Section 29(2) of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963.
21 Dec 2006The writ petition arose from a demand notice dated 23 June 2003 issued to the petitioner, proprietress of Vishal Liquors, an ex-CLII licensee, for an ...
- 55
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses State's Appeal in VAT Dispute — Purchase Price Under GVAT Act Does Not Include VAT Component. Value Added Tax and unclaimed tax credit purchases excluded from taxable turnover of purchases for reduction of tax credit under Section 11(3)(b) of Gujarat Value Added Tax Act, 2003.
2 Aug 2024The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which affirmed the order of the Gujarat Value Added Tax Tribunal. The dis...
- 615
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Property Tax Levy by Panvel Municipal Corporation on Kharghar Node. Petitioners Lacked Locus Standi and Failed to Exhaust Statutory Remedy of Appeal Under Section 406 of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949.
6 Apr 2023The petitioners, Kharghar Co-op. Housing Societies Federation and an individual resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution ...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Reference Application in Customs Duty Evasion Case Due to Inordinate Delay. Application filed under Section 130 of Customs Act, 1962 for reference of questions of law from CEGAT order held time-barred as delay of 240 days not explained.
27 Jul 2006The Commissioner of Customs (Import) filed an application under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 seeking a reference to the High Court of certain ...
- 65
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging GST Detention Orders for Lack of Proper Adjudication. Principles of Natural Justice Violated as Show Cause Notices Were Issued Without Considering Petitioner's Reply.
18 Jul 2023The petitioner, M/s. Vinod Metal and M/s. Vinod Steel, proprietorship and HUF concerns of Vinodkumar Velraj Mehta, filed multiple writ petitions under...
- 72
