Search Results for "reopening after four years"

343 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to Recall Order in Execution Proceedings. Judgment Debtor's Application Under Section 151 CPC for Recalling Order Dated 10.07.2024 Was Rightly Dismissed as Not Maintainable.

The petitioner, M/s Pushpam Realty, a partnership firm, is the judgment debtor in Execution No.1075/2020 pending before the III Additional City Civil ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Proper Application of Mind. Notice and Order Set Aside as Show Cause Notice Did Not Disclose Reasons for Reopening Assessment Beyond Four Years.

The petitioner, Anand Kumar Somasheshekarayya Lonarmath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure. Petitioner's claim of set off of unabsorbed depreciation was disclosed in return and notes, hence no failure to disclose material facts.

The petitioner, Mukand Limited, a company incorporated under the Indian Companies Act, 1913, filed a writ petition challenging a notice dated 26th Apr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Penalty Under Section 271(1)(c) for Concealment of Income in Land Sale Transaction. Assessee failed to disclose receipt of advance sale consideration in return, leading to penalty for concealment.

The appellant-assessee, along with four others, executed an agreement for sale of a plot of land at Vasai on 07.12.2004 for a total consideration of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Joint Commissioner Had Jurisdiction to Invoke Suo Moto Revision Under Section 63-A. Purchases from Composition Dealers Not Deductible from Contract Receipts for Taxable Turnover.

The case involves revision petitions filed by M/S JMC Projects (India) Ltd. against the State of Karnataka under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Order in Income Tax Case for Non-Compliance with GKN Driveshafts Procedure. Revenue failed to communicate order rejecting objections and passed assessment order within four weeks, violating principles of natural justice.

The petitioner, Capgemini India Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and the subsequent reassessment order da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Tax Appeals in Reassessment Cases Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961. No Substantial Question of Law Found as Tribunal's Findings Were Based on Appreciation of Evidence.

The judgment pertains to multiple tax appeals filed by individual assessees against the Commissioner of Income Tax, Goa. The appellants, including Sha...