Search Results for "patent illegality"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "patent illegality"

1383 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1383 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Commercial Division, Adjudicates Arbitration Petition Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act — Challenge to Arbitral Award in Indian Premier League Franchise Dispute. Award Directed Payment of Damages and Interest to Franchisee; Petition Alleges Patent Illegality and Excess of Jurisdiction by Arbitrator.

16 Jun 2021

The dispute arose from the termination of a franchise agreement between the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), the governing body for crick...

High Court

Madras High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute — Upholds Refund of EPF/ESI Withholdings but Remits Liquidated Damages Issue for Reconsideration. The court found that the arbitrator's rejection of liquidated damages was patently illegal due to non-consideration of contractual provisions, while the refund of EPF/ESI withholdings was valid.

2 Jan 2026

The judgment concerns two petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, arising from an arbitral award dated 01.07.2019. T...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Appeal by Northern Railways Challenging Arbitral Award in Solar Power Plant Contract Dispute. Court Holds That No Grounds Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Were Established as the Award Was Based on Evidence and a Plausible Interpretation of the Contract.

16 Mar 2026

The case involves an appeal by Northern Railways against the dismissal of its application under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 19...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviewed Writ Petition Against IPAB Order Cancelling Pharmaceutical Trademark Registration. The Court Examined Whether Rectification Application Was Maintainable Under Section 124 Trade Marks Act, 1999 and Whether IPAB Correctly Applied Deceptive Similarity Test to Cancel OFLOMAC Mark.

15 Feb 2023

The dispute concerned pharmaceutical trademarks OFLOMAC and OFRAMAX. Macleods Pharmaceuticals Limited, the petitioner, challenged an order of the Inte...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award in Revenue Sharing Dispute. Court upholds award granting 7% revenue share and costs, finding no patent illegality or perversity in arbitrator's interpretation of contract clauses.

11 Jun 2012

The petitioner, Taj Air Ltd. (formerly Megapode Airlines Ltd.), filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeki...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Employer’s Petition under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Challenging Arbitral Award Directing Allotment of ESOP Shares to Ex-Employee. Questions Arise on Whether Absence of Formal ESOP Scheme Under Companies Act, 2013 Invalidates Contractual Vesting of Options and Whether Specific Performance Was Appropriate Remedy.

5 Aug 2026

The petitioner, Waterfield Advisors Private Limited, a management consultancy firm, filed this petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Concil...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Commercial Appeal in Arbitration Matter — Sets Aside Order Dismissing Section 34 Petition. Court holds that the Commercial Court erred in dismissing the petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, as the award was patently illegal for ignoring contractual terms and failing to consider the appellant's counterclaim.

14 Mar 2025

The present appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s. Strategic Infra Services Pvt. Ltd. (appellant) and Mphasis Limited (respondent). The ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Challenging Arbitral Award Rejecting Contractor's Claims for Railway Maintenance Contract. Court upholds award on grounds of no patent illegality or perversity, finding that the arbitrator's decision was based on proper appreciation of evidence and contractual terms.

8 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Amit Engineers, a government contractor, was awarded a work order by the Central Railway for an annual maintenance contract of RM...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Design Infringement Case, Modifying Consent Decree Due to Typographical Error. The Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the application under Sections 152 and 153 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as a misunderstanding between parties warranted correction of the Settlement Agreement to reflect the intended trademark 'FX-991ES PLUS'/'FX-991'.

4 Feb 2022

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed by the Respondent against the Appellant for design infringement and trademark violation regarding scientific...

High Court

Madras High Court Considers Appeal Against Order Setting Aside Arbitral Award in Berth Reservation Dispute. Court Examines Whether the Claim Was Barred by Limitation and Whether the Award Was Patently Illegal Under Sections 34 and 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Mar 2026

The judgment of the Madras High Court in OSA (CAD) No. 39 of 2021 involved an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, a...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)