Search Results for "interest disallowed"

528 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 528 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Amendment of Plaint in Property Suit — No New Case Introduced. Amendment to incorporate subsequent events and clarify pleadings is permissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as it does not change the nature of the suit.

The petitioner, defendant no.1 in a civil suit, challenged an order dated 30.08.2021 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded, allo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Redemption Fine as Business Expenditure. Redemption fine of Rs. 75,00,000 paid for unauthorized import of almonds held allowable as business expenditure under Section 37 of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

The appeal was filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which allowed the asses...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case on Lease Rental Deduction for Idle Machinery. Business decision to keep dozers idle and pay lease rentals without use held not allowable as expenditure under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) which had allowed the assessee's claim for deduction of lease renta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Invocation of Bank Guarantee in Commercial Dispute. Bank Guarantee Invocation Upheld as No Case of Fraud or Irretrievable Injustice Made Out.

The petitioner, M/s. Atul Medical, filed a writ petition challenging the invocation of a bank guarantee of Rs. 8 lacs by the respondent, M/s. Cadila H...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....