Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition No. 1326 of 2014 Involving Customs Matter. The Specific Outcome and Legal Principles Are Not Available from the Provided Text.
30 Jun 2025...
Search Results for "deterrent punishment"
251 result(s) found
Found 251 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Revenue Tribunal Order in Land Mutation Dispute — Failure to Consider Evidence and Apply Correct Legal Principles. Court sets aside order for non-consideration of documentary evidence and misapplication of Section 149 of the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.
30 Jan 2026The petitioners, legal representatives of the original owners Govind Goma Gaikar and Laxmi Govind Gaikar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High...
- 391
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction in Arson and Murder Case. Accused Challenged Conviction Under Sections 302, 436, 342, 143, 147, 148, 149, 120B IPC; State Filed Appeal Seeking Enhancement of Sentence.
7 Oct 2016The High Court of Judicature at Bombay adjudicated eight criminal appeals filed against the judgment dated 9 May 2005 by the 4th Additional Sessions J...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows KKRTC's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case Due to Error in Multiplier Application. Compensation Reduced from Rs.1,10,36,200/- to Rs.98,10,200/- as Tribunal Applied Multiplier of 18 Instead of Correct Multiplier of 16 for Deceased Aged 30 Years Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
23 Apr 2026The Kalyan Karnataka Road Transport Corporation (KKRTC) appealed against the judgment and award dated 14.03.2025 passed by the Motor Accident Claim Tr...
- 139
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279, 338, 304(A) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Establish Rash or Negligent Driving Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
19 Apr 2024The case arises from a road accident that occurred on 19.04.2011 at about 2.30 p.m. when an ambulance driven by the accused collided with an Alto car,...
- 188
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Conspiracy Case Due to Non-Compliance with Investigation Duties and Lack of Evidence. Conviction Under Sections 302, 201 IPC and Section 25(1)(1b)(a) Arms Act Set Aside as Investigation Flawed and Conspiracy Charge Not Addressed While Co-Accused Acquitted.
24 Apr 2023The Supreme Court considered an appeal by an appellant convicted for murder, destruction of evidence, and arms offenses, while other co-accused were a...
- 400
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Rape and Murder of Minor, Commutes Death Sentence to Life Imprisonment Without Remission. The Court held that the case does not fall within the 'rarest of rare' category for death penalty, but the appellant must serve life imprisonment without remission.
20 Apr 2023The appellant was convicted by the Trial Court under Sections 302 and 376 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC) for the rape and murder of a 14-year-old girl...
- 190
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Constitutional Validity of Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006 Upon Challenge by Trade Associations. Court Holds That Constitutional Challenge Cannot Be Abstract and Requires Factual Foundation of Adverse Action, But Proceeds to Hear Merits for Recurring Issues.
16 Sep 2015The Bombay High Court heard a batch of three writ petitions filed by trade associations—the Association of the Traders carrying the Food Business, M...
- 25
High Court
Special Court at Bombay adjudicates securities scam trial against seventeen accused — Allegations of defrauding Standard Chartered Bank of ₹890 crores through unbacked bank receipts and forged securities. Charges include criminal breach of trust, forgery, and conspiracy under the Indian Penal Code and trial conducted under the Special Court (Trial of Offences Relating to Transactions in Securities) Act, 1992.
30 Jan 2019The case arose from the 1991-92 securities scam that affected the Indian economy. The Standard Chartered Bank (SCB) had an Investment Banking Division...
- 32
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Endorsement in Urban Land Ceiling Case — Petitioner's Land Not Subject to ULC Act as Proceedings Lapsed. The court held that the land in question was not vacant land on the appointed day and the proceedings under the Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 had lapsed, rendering the impugned endorsement without jurisdiction.
26 Sep 2018The petitioner, Miss Raksha R Acharya, claiming to be the owner of 60 cents of land in Sy.No.152/2 in Padavu village, Mangaluru Taluk, filed a writ pe...
- 53
