Search Results for "detention order quashed"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "detention order quashed"

1115 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1115 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition, Quashes MPDA Detention Order Due to Unexplained Delay. The court held that the live link between the detenu's alleged prejudicial activity and the preventive detention order was broken due to an unexplained delay of four months from the date of arrest and three months from the grant of bail.

15 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Shivkumar Madeshwaran Devendra, brother-in-law of the detenu Manoj Tangraj Devendra, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay of 5 Months. Failure to Comply with Section 3(3) Requirement of Forthwith Approval and Delay in Considering Representation Renders Detention Invalid.

15 Jun 2022

The petitioner, Sachin Parshuram Mane, challenged an order of detention dated 30.06.2021 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City under Section...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Under MPDA Act for Lack of Evidence of Public Order Disturbance. Sand Smuggling and Criminal Acts Do Not Automatically Justify Preventive Detention as They Pertain to Law and Order, Not Public Order.

3 Aug 2020

The petitioner, Baliram s/o Namdeo Bedke, challenged his preventive detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Unexplained Delay in Disposal of Representation. Failure to Consider Detenu's Representation Promptly Violates Article 22(5) of the Constitution, Rendering Detention Invalid.

20 Dec 2016

The petitioner, Yahya @ Ayya Akbar Khan, challenged a preventive detention order dated 30 July 2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Bail Conditions and Inadequate Verification of Incamera Statements. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Did Not Consider Petitioner's Bail Status and Failed to Verify Incamera Statements.

15 Sep 2015

The petitioner, Jay @ Nunya Rajesh Bhosale, challenged a detention order dated 19.5.2015 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune, under Section 3(2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Challenging COFEPOSA Detention Orders on Grounds of Constructive Res Judicata. Fresh Grounds Must Be Raised in Earlier Petitions or Are Barred.

1 Aug 2014

The judgment concerns two criminal writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders of detention passed under Se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPD Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation. Unexplained Delay of Over 30 Days in Deciding Representation Violates Fundamental Right Under Article 22(5) of the Constitution of India.

24 Jun 2014

The petitioner, Ajay Suresh Alande, brother of the detenu Chetan Suresh Alande, filed a Criminal Writ Petition challenging the detention order dated 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 for Non-Application of Mind to Bail Conditions. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider That Petitioner Was on Bail and Could Be Prosecuted Under Regular Law, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid.

1 Dec 2011

The petitioner, Santosh Tukaram Chavan, was detained under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application for Documents Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the petitioner's application dated 2.10.2004 seeking copies of documents vitiated the detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders & Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Ramesh Ramnath Shetty, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 17th September 2004 under ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Representation and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's representation dated 7-9-2004 was not considered by the detaining authority, and the detention order disclosed total non-application of mind.

12 Jan 2005

The petitioner, Sanpreet Kaur Tejpal Singh, wife of the detenu Tejpal Mann Singh, challenged the detention order dated 6-2-2004 passed by respondent N...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)