Search Results for "coparceners"

251 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 251 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Remand Order in Property Dispute - Concurrent Findings on Limitation Upheld. High Court Erred in Remanding Matter for Fresh Trial Instead of Deciding Substantial Question of Law Under Section 100 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The appeal arose from a property dispute involving a joint Hindu family. The litigation originated from a 1965 suit (O.S.No.851 of 1965) filed by Sund...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Bank's Revision and Appeal in SARFAESI Act Case — Civil Suit Barred Under Section 34. Jurisdiction of Civil Court is Ousted When Secured Creditor Takes Action Under SARFAESI Act for Enforcement of Security Interest.

The case involves a civil suit filed by Sagar and Saurabh Deshmukh (original plaintiffs) against their father Pramod Deshmukh, mother Vrunda Deshmukh,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine. Court finds that the plaintiff failed to discharge burden of proving the agreement and that the defendant's possession was permissive, not as a prospective purchaser.

The appellant, M/s Multicon Builders, a registered partnership firm through its partner Suryakant Gendasingh Thakur, was the original defendant no.9 i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Agreement Not Proved as Valid Contract. Unilateral Document Executed by Husband Without Wife's Signature Does Not Bind Owner Under Transfer of Property Act, 1882.

The appellant, Smt. Badrunisa, filed a suit for possession and damages against the respondents, Sabdar Khan and Halimabi, claiming ownership of a suit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Execution Petition — Limitation for Appeal Under Section 100 CPC Not Applicable to Orders Under Order 21 Rule 32 CPC. First Appellate Court Directed to Consider Condonation of Delay Application on Merits Before Dismissing Appeal as Time-Barred.

This second appeal was filed by the decree-holder in HRC 4/78 against the rejection of his execution petition in Exn.P.162/90 and the judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Procedure Code Case — No Error Apparent on Face of Record. Review Petition under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 CPC fails as petitioner seeks re-argument on merits, not review of error.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, presided over by Hon'ble Mr. Justice S Sunil Dutt Yadav, delivered a CAV order on 16.12.2025 in Review Petit...