Search Results for "condonation of delay"

617 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 617 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhancement of Land Acquisition Compensation Due to Inordinate Delay of 2283 Days Without Sufficient Cause. Delay Condonation Application Rejected as Appellant Failed to Provide Adequate Explanation for the Delay.

The appellant, R.G. Girijamma, was the claimant in L.A.C.No.237/2005 before the Senior Civil Judge, Harihar, seeking enhanced compensation for land ac...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Complainant's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal Against Acquittal. Court Held That the Sessions Court's Refusal to Condone Delay Was Justified as the Complainant Failed to Provide Sufficient Cause for the Delay.

The petitioner, Hari Mudkhede, was the original complainant in a criminal case against four accused persons (respondents 2 to 5) under Sections 324, 5...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Delay in Challenging Income Tax Appellate Tribunal Order. Challenge to 2007 ITAT order filed in 2012 dismissed as grossly delayed without sufficient explanation.

The petitioner, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Limited, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court on 1 October 2012 challenging an order of the Inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Appeal Due to Petitioner's Arrest and Detention. Held that sufficient cause for delay is established when the appellant was in custody and unable to file appeal within limitation period.

The petitioner, Pravin Borkute, filed a suit for preemption against his brother Dinkar Borkute and others, and sought a temporary injunction to restra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Central Excise Appeal Limitation Case — Commissioner (Appeals) Has No Power to Condon Delay Beyond 60 Days Under Section 35 of Central Excise Act, 1944. Appeal filed beyond 90 days from order date cannot be entertained.

The petitioner, M/s Sheetal Enterprises, a manufacturer of industrial lubricants, availed benefit of Nil rate of duty for export under Rules 13 and 14...