Search Results for "Stamp papers"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Stamp papers"

559 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 559 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Regular First Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Against Order Rejecting Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC in Suit for Partition and Declaration. Trial Court Found No Cause of Action and Allowed Application Filed by Defendants 24 and 26; Appeal Examines Whether Plaint Discloses Triable Issues.

29 Jun 2026

The present Regular First Appeal was filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, by the plaintiffs against the order dated 14.10.2019...

High Court

Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka Decides Regular First Appeal in a Partition, Declaration and Injunction Suit. The Court Allows or Dismisses the Appeal Based on the Merits of the Case.

29 Jun 2026

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Licensee's Petition Challenging Eviction Order Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act — Licensee Cannot Claim Right to Continue Occupation After Expiry of License Term. The Court held that a licensee must vacate upon expiry of the license period and cannot resist eviction by claiming additional security deposit or improvements without proof.

5 May 2026

The Petitioner, Mohammed Arbaaz Aziz Farooqui, was a licensee of Flat No. 143, B-Wing, 14th floor, Heera Panna CHS, Tulsiwadi, Mumbai, under a registe...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Civil Suit, Restoring Trial Court's Order and Granting Interim Injunction. The Court held that the second suit was not barred under Order II Rule 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, as the causes of action and properties involved were distinct from the first suit, and the plaint disclosed a cause of action arising after knowledge from the written statement.

16 Apr 2026

The dispute involved a family property conflict where the appellants, the wife and daughters of the deceased original owner, challenged a Power of Att...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Appeal for Specific Performance of Sale Agreement — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Readiness and Willingness. Time was not of essence but plaintiff's conduct showed lack of continuous readiness, disentitling him to discretionary relief under Section 16(c) of the Specific Relief Act, 1963.

12 Feb 2026

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 09.03.2006 for 51 cents of land at Rs.25,000 per cent. He paid...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Readiness and Willingness. Agreement of Sale with Possession and Part Payment Enforced Against Subsequent Purchaser Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

7 Jan 2025

The second appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of a sale agreement dated 15.7.1987 between the plaintiff (first respondent) and the fir...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Rejects Plaint for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action and Barred by Limitation. Order VII Rule 11(a) and (d) CPC applied to plaint seeking declaration of title and possession based on unregistered sale deed and unproven will.

23 Jul 2021

The petitioner, Sri P.R. Chenna Reddy, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), challenging the o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Second Appeal Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Appeal Against Injunction Decree. The Court Analyzed Principles Governing Condonation of Delay Under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963, as Laid Down in Esha Bhattacharjee v. Managing Committee.

2 Aug 2017

The case involved an application for condonation of delay filed by the Superintending Archaeologist, Archaeological Survey of India, in appealing a de...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Revision Petition for Delivery of Possession Under Order 21 Rule 95 CPC — Decree Holder Entitled to Possession After Court Sale Confirmation. The court held that once a court auction sale is confirmed, the purchaser has a right to delivery of possession under Order 21 Rule 95 CPC, and the executing court cannot dismiss such application.

30 Apr 2014

The petitioner, the decree holder in O.S.No.222/1996, had obtained a money decree against the respondent for Rs.1,15,500/-. In execution proceedings (...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaintiff Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract. Agreement to Sell Not Proved as Genuine Transaction Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Discrepancies in Pleadings.

19 Jul 2013

The appellant, T. Narayana, filed a Regular First Appeal before the High Court of Karnataka against the dismissal of his suit for specific performance...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)