Search Results for "Single Attempt"

3151 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3151 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Infringement of Well-Known Mark 'Raymond' in Domain Name for Dissimilar Goods; Discusses Scope of Section 29(4) of Trade Marks Act, 1999. Domain Name 'raymondpharma.com' Not Found to Infringe 'Raymond' Mark Under Section 29(4) Due to Dissimilar Goods and Prior Litigation Bar.

The dispute arose from the Plaintiff Raymond Limited's claim that the Defendant Raymond Pharmaceutical Pvt. Ltd. infringed its well-known registered t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Interim Order for Deposit of Security Deposit in Arbitration Dispute — Essar House Private Limited v. Arcellor Mittal Nippon Steel India Limited

The case involves two appeals filed under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, by Essar House Private Limited and Essar Services ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Letters of Administration in Succession Dispute — No Grounds for Revocation Under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Concealment of Material Facts Not Established; Court Had Jurisdiction as Deceased's Fixed Place of Abode Was in Mumbai.

The petitioner, Kamal Prasad, filed a petition under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, seeking revocation of Letters of Administration g...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Maintainability of Commercial Appeals Against Interim Orders in Trademark Infringement Suits. Preliminary Objection Raised That Orders Impugned Do Not Fall Within Appealable Categories Under Section 13(1A) of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 as Amended.

These two commercial appeals were filed by the original defendants in intellectual property suits pending before the Bombay High Court. The suits, ins...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Landowners’ Challenge to Land Acquisition Award and Corrigendum After 31 Years Due to Invalid Inclusion. Corrigendum Issued Without Statutory Power to Modify Final Award Beyond Reasonable Time Declared Void, and Award Excluding Landowners’ Land Not Binding.

The petitioners, legal heirs of the original landowner Late Ahamad Izzat Mohammed Hasham Dada, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitu...