Search Results for "Separate assessment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Separate assessment"

2013 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2013 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses LIC's Challenge to Maharashtra Increase in Land Revenue Act. Non-agricultural land in Greater Bombay is subject to the Act, and Section 3 is constitutionally valid.

13 Jun 2005

The petitioner, Life Insurance Corporation of India (LIC), a statutory corporation constituted under the Life Insurance Corporation of India Act, 1956...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reviews Its Own Judgment That Struck Down Ex Post Facto Environmental Clearance Notifications Under Environment (Protection) Act. Review Petition Seeks Recall Citing Overlooked Binding Precedents.

1 Jan 1970

Background: The present matter is a review petition arising from the Supreme Court's judgment in Vanashakti v. Union of India, dated 16 May 2025, whic...

High Court

KAHC010451182019_1

14 Feb 2020

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Appeal Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act Maintainable on Limitation Issue Even When Valuation/Rate of Duty Not Disputed. The Court ruled that the question of limitation is a distinct legal issue not relating to assessment, valuation, or rate of duty, and thus appeals challenging only the time-bar aspect are maintainable before the High Court under Section 35G.

23 Dec 2021

The case arose from a Central Excise Appeal filed by the Commissioner of CGST & Central Excise, Belapur, against Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd. ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Delivers Judgment on Batch of Writ Petitions Concerning Input Tax Credit Under KVAT Act. Interpretation of Section 10(3) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 and Availment of Input Tax Credit Irrespective of Invoice Month Framed the Core Issue.

10 Jan 2018

A batch of writ petitions came before the High Court of Karnataka under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, filed by various companies including...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Appeal by Successful Resolution Applicant Against EPFO Claim for Pre-CIRP Dues, Holding That Resolution Plan Approved Under IBC Is Binding on All Stakeholders Including Statutory Authorities. The tribunal ruled that EPFO's failure to file claim during CIRP results in extinguishment of dues, and the corporate debtor gets a clean slate post-resolution.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two appeals arising from an order of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Mumbai Bench, dated 03.07.2024, which allowed an appl...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Taxpayer Against Non-Processing of Income Tax Returns and Refund Claims. Mandamus Issued to Process Returns Under Section 143(1) Within Four Weeks, Subject to Section 143(1D) and Section 241A of the Income Tax Act, 1961.

1 Jan 2020

The appellant, Vodafone Idea Ltd. (formerly Vodafone Mobile Services Ltd), is a telecommunications company that filed income tax returns for Assessmen...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Intra-Court Appeals Against Order Upholding Blocking of Electronic Credit Ledgers Under Rule 86A of CGST Rules; Considers Requirement of Pre-Decisional Hearing and Bonafide Purchaser Protection.

2 Apr 2024

The appeals arose from a common order dated 27.07.2023 passed by a Single Judge in a batch of writ petitions, rejecting the contentions of the appella...

Supreme Court

"Supreme Court of India Resolves Complexities in Taxation of Mineral Rights" "Judgment Clarifies Legislative Powers and the Nature of Royalty in Mining Sector"

25 Jul 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a significant dispute regarding the distribution of legislative powers between the Union and the States, specific...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Assessee's Reference on Depreciation Rates but Upholds Revenue's Disallowances on Travel Expenses, Medical Reimbursement, Motor Car Perquisite, and Rent as Capital Expenditure. The Court held that depreciation under Section 32 must be allowed at rates as amended from 2.4.1983, while affirming that employee travel expenses after destination are disallowable under Section 39 read with Rule 60, medical reimbursement is part of salary under Section 40(c), actual expenditure on motor cars for directors is to be considered, and rent of Rs.16,91,250/- is capital expenditure.

18 Sep 2012

This is a reference under Section 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal in ITA No.5873/Bom/8...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)