Search Results for "Section 47(3)"

315 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 315 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Mamlatdar's Orders in Land Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice Principles. Failure to Provide Hearing Opportunity to Stakeholders Under Section 5 of Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 Renders Proceedings Void as Authorities Acted Mechanically Without Judicial Application of Mind.

The dispute originated from proceedings under Section 5 of the Mamlatdar's Courts Act, 1906 concerning certain agricultural lands. The petitioners, wh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Liability Not Fastened as Driver Had No Valid Driving Licence. Owner Failed to Verify Licence Validity, Insurance Company Not Liable but Directed to Pay and Recover Under Section 149(2)(a)(ii) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeal was filed by the Oriental Insurance Company Limited challenging the judgment and award dated 30.06.2012 passed by the Additional Senior Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Mutation Entries in Land Revenue Records — Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Are Only for Fiscal Purposes Under the Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966.

The petitioners, Shree Sai Reality, Shree Sai Infratech, and Shree Sai Buildtech, through their partner Sandeep Dindyal Aagarval, filed a writ petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows in Part Appeals by Claimants and State in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute. Market Value of Agricultural Land Determined at Rs. 1,00,000 per Hectare Under Section 18 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, with Interest on Enhanced Compensation.

The case involves four appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The State of Maharashtra acquired agric...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Superannuation Dispute. Employee Entitled to Continue Till Age 60 as Per Certified Standing Orders Under Section 28 and Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Sunflag Iron & Steel Company Limited, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Bhandara, which allowed a complaint filed by th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Dacoity Case Due to Lack of Identification and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 395 and 397 IPC set aside as identification parade was not conducted and recovery of stolen property was not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 395 and 397 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for dacoity and robbery with attempt...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Food Adulteration Case Due to Discrepancy Between Analyst Reports and Non-Compliance with Sampling Rules. Acquittal of Accused Upheld as Prosecution Failed to Prove Adulteration Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The State of Maharashtra, through the Food Inspector, appealed against the judgment and order dated 11/10/2000 passed by the 6th Judicial Magistrate F...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Preventive Detention Order Beyond Three Months Under Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Interpretation of 'Such Detention' in Article 22(4)(a) of the Constitution Confirmed to Refer to Preventive Detention, Not Period of Detention.

The case involved a constitutional challenge to an order of preventive detention under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, as amended. The appellant, ...