Search Results for "Section 353 IPC"

262 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 262 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case of Mentally Retarded Woman Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 376(2)(l) IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Suresh Devidas Malche, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, in Sessions Case No.25 of 2014 for the offence punishab...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Failure to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction Based on Section 106 of Evidence Act Set Aside as Prosecution Did Not Establish Foundational Facts.

The appellant, Raosaheb Kakade, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his wife, Chhayabai, by the Additional Sess...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Grants Pre-Arrest Bail to Forest Officer in SC/ST Act Case — Allegations of Caste-Based Insult Found Prima Facie Not Made Out. Court holds that mere use of caste name without intent to insult in public view does not attract Section 3(1)(x) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The appellant, Rajendra s/o Pundlik Nale, a forest officer working as Assistant Conservator of Forests, filed a criminal appeal challenging the order ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Doctor for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Held Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Dr. Rajendra Kapgate, a medical practitioner, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Neeta. The couple married ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Illegible Documents and Lack of Marathi Translation. Preventive Detention Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution When Grounds Not Communicated Effectively.

The petitioner, Rahul Ambadas Jadhav, was detained under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-offenders ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Applications Challenging Charge Framing and Discharge in 1993 Mumbai Riot Case. Prima Facie Case Established for Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities.

The judgment pertains to two criminal revision applications filed by original accused nos. 32 and 76 in Sessions Case No. 930 of 2002, arising from C....