WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 1338 OF 2020
1 Jan 1970...
Search Results for "Section 135 Indian Contract Act"
384 result(s) found
Found 384 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.
9 Dec 2022The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...
- 245
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Considers Challenge to Forest Notification as Ultra Vires the Constitution and Forest Laws — Mining Companies Allege Notification Violates Article 246 and Entry 54 of Union List, Karnataka Forest Act, 1963 and Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980
3 Dec 2015The matter involved multiple writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka by several mining corporations and mineral industries, including ...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Section 37 Appeal Against Arbitral Award in Stock Transaction Dispute — No Perversity or Wednesbury Unreasonableness Found. The Court held that a new argument not raised before the arbitrator or in Section 34 proceedings cannot be raised for the first time in a Section 37 appeal.
15 Apr 2024The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by SATCO Capital Markets Ltd. against Rahul H Bajaj....
- 96
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Review and Writ Petitions in GST Input Tax Credit Refund Case for Duty Free Shops. Sale of duty free goods at airport departure area is not export, hence no refund of ITC under Section 54 of CGST Act, 2017.
7 Oct 2019The judgment concerns three matters: a criminal application seeking review of dismissal of a PIL, and two writ petitions challenging an adjudication o...
- 106
High Court
Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 47 of 2013 Regarding Change of Land Use and Allotment. The court examined the validity of modifying user of a plot from public utility to commercial and the subsequent allotment to a trust.
7 Sep 2016This Public Interest Litigation (PIL) was filed by Citizen Forum For Equality, a registered NGO, challenging the modification of user of a plot in the...
- 61
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudicates Interim Application by Writers of Original Film Against Remake Film Producers Alleging Copyright Infringement of Literary Works. Writers Claim Exclusive Copyright in Story, Screenplay and Dialogues of 1973 Film 'Zanjeer' and Seek Injunction Against Unauthorized Remake in Hindi and Telugu Under Sections 18 and 19 of Copyright Act, 1957.
2 Sep 2013The matter arises from a copyright dispute over the iconic Hindi film 'Zanjeer' (1973). Plaintiffs Salim Khan and Javed Akhtar, acclaimed writers, cla...
- 60
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Petitions Against TDS Notices Issued to Turf Clubs Under Section 194B of Income Tax Act — Argued That Stake Money Is Not Winnings. Petitioners Contend That CBDT Circular No.467 Exempts Stake Money From TDS and That Such Payments Are Business Income Taxable Under Section 74A, Not Winnings Under Section 194B.
26 Sep 2014The batch of writ petitions before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore arose from notices issued by the Income Tax Department to turf clubs in Ba...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Public Interest Litigation Challenging Lavasa Hill Station Project and Statutory Approvals. Petition Raises Issues of Compliance with Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, Special Regulations for Hill Station Development, and Approval of Water Weirs on Varasgaon Dam Backwaters.
26 Feb 2022The judgment under consideration stems from a Public Interest Litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay. The petitioner, a legal ...
- 33
High Court
Bombay High Court Passes Order on Interim Plea Over Yes Bank Management Rights Claimed by Heirs of Ashok Kapur. Core Issue Involves Interpretation of Articles of Association Regarding Heritability of Co-founder's Defined Privileges Following His Death in 2008 Mumbai Terror Attacks.
4 Jun 2015The judgment deals with a Notice of Motion taken out by the legal heirs of late Ashok Kapur, co-founder of Yes Bank, who perished in the November 2008...
- 88
