Search Results for "Pay Commission arrears"

530 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 530 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Petition for Interest on Delayed Retiral Benefits in Service Matter. Petitioner entitled to 6% interest per annum on delayed payment of retiral benefits from date of retirement till actual payment.

The petitioner, Karamshibhai Laljibhai Gajjar (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), filed a writ petition under Articles 14, 16, 21, and 226 o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Daily Wager Challenging Industrial Court's Order on Res Judicata Grounds. Petitioner's claim for permanency and equal pay barred by earlier complaint dismissed for default, but High Court upholds dismissal on ground of abuse of process.

The petitioner, Rajendra Tribhuvandas Navare, a retired daily wager employed with Solapur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds 2020 Tribunal Rules with Modifications to Ensure Judicial Independence. Court directs changes to Search-cum-Selection Committee composition and member qualifications to align with constitutional principles.

The Supreme Court of India was called upon to decide the constitutional validity of the Tribunal, Appellate Tribunal and other Authorities (Qualificat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in IMTRAT Allowance Parity Case. High Court's Clarification on Parity Between Bhutan Compensatory Allowance and Foreign Allowance Upheld as Within Scope of Original Order.

The case involves a dispute over compensatory allowances payable to Indian Military Training Team (IMTRAT) personnel posted in Bhutan. The IMTRAT pers...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Addition of Party in Electricity Dues Suit. Addition of Petitioner as Defendant No.2 Upheld Under Order I Rule 10 CPC to Avoid Multiplicity of Proceedings and Effectuate Decree.

The petitioner, M/s Manidhari Air Products, challenged an order of the trial court allowing an application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 151...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Retrospective Levy of Supervision Costs Under Bombay Prohibition Act. Retrospective Recovery of Supervision Costs from Liquor Licensee Quashed as Without Statutory Authority Under Section 58A of Bombay Prohibition Act, 1949.

The petitioner, M/s. Vidarbha Liquor Corporation, a partnership firm holding a liquor license, challenged the retrospective levy and recovery of super...