Search Results for "Null and void transfer"

545 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 545 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Contractual Forfeiture Case — HUDCO Cannot Forfeit Payments Without Fulfilling Reciprocal Obligations. Allotment Cancellation and Forfeiture of Rs. 28.11 Crores Set Aside as Unjust Enrichment Where Lessor Failed to Execute Agreement to Sub-Lease.

The dispute arose from an allotment letter issued by HUDCO to Tomorrowland Limited for a 99-year lease of land to build a 5-star hotel. The appellant ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 144C Procedure. Tribunal's Order Upheld as Draft Assessment Order Not Served to Assessee, Violating Mandatory Requirement.

The case involves an appeal by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax against an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Panaji, dated 21 Januar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sale of Granted Land on Grounds of Delay and Laches. Petitioner Failed to Challenge Sale Deed Executed in 1972 for Over 30 Years, Despite Knowledge.

The petitioner, Smt. Guthemma Kom Fakira Chalvadi, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders da...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Return of Appeal Memo for Lack of Pecuniary Jurisdiction. Forum of appeal determined by valuation in decree, not plaint valuation under Section 8 of Suits Valuation Act, 1887 and Section 6 of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869.

The petitioners, original plaintiffs, filed Regular Civil Suit No.1171 of 2006 seeking declaration that a gift deed dated 10/11/2005 executed by defen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion for Interim Relief in Specific Performance Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Plaintiffs Failed to Make Out Prima Facie Case for Appointment of Receiver or Injunction.

The plaintiffs, M/s. Pride Associates and others, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 4th June 2005 for a property in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement to Sell Not Proved and Suit Barred by Limitation. Plaintiff failed to prove execution of agreement and suit was filed beyond three years from notice of refusal under Article 54 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The appellant, Sandeep Kashinath Parab, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell dated 15/06/1998 allegedly executed by the respo...