Search Results for "NDPS Act"

481 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 481 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition for Ordinary Leave to NDPS Convict Due to Bar Under Prison Rule 21(h)(3). Court Holds Convict Under NDPS Act Not Entitled to Ordinary Leave and No Extraordinary Circumstances Shown to Invoke Rule 40 Discretion.

The writ petition was filed by the wife of a convict under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking a writ of certiorarified mandamus to quas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal in NDPS Act Case, Reducing Sentence to Period Already Served. Conviction Under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) Upheld for Transporting 3327 kg of Ganja, but Sentence Modified Due to Appellant's Mitigating Circumstances as Indigent Helper.

The appeal arose from a conviction under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985, for transporting 3327 kg of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Grants Bail to Accused No.2 in NDPS Case Involving 49.7 kg Ganja — Petitioner Not Found in Exclusive Possession of Contraband and No Criminal Antecedents

The petitioner, Irfan Ali, accused No.2, filed a criminal petition under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) seeking bail in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in NDPS Case Due to Lack of Conscious Possession and Flawed Investigation. Conviction for cannabis recovery quashed as prosecution failed to prove ownership and possession beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 8C, 20(b)(ii)(c), 35, 54 of NDPS Act.

The appellant, Gangadhar alias Gangaram, was convicted under Section 8C read with Section 20(b)(ii)(c) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Second FIR in Narcotics Case as Part of Same Transaction. Second FIR Based on Accused's Disclosure During Custodial Interrogation Quashed Under Section 482 Cr.P.C.

Background: The petitioner, a British national, was facing two FIRs under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985. The first FIR (No....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 Notice. Failure to Inform Appellant of Right to Search Before Magistrate or Gazetted Officer Renders Recovery of Contraband Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Ms. Naomi Banda, a Zambian national, was convicted by a Special Judge under the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (N...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...