Search Results for "Master Service Agreement"

715 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 715 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Third Party Claim in Execution Proceedings — ING Bank N.V. Fails to Prove Ownership of Attached Flat. Claim under Section 47 CPC and Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 rejected as bank did not establish that the flat was not owned by judgment debtor.

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by ING Bank N.V., a third party, under Section 47 read with Order XXI Rules 58 and 64 of the Code of Civ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Respondents in Contempt for Breach of Injunction Order. Resolutions Increasing Authorised Capital and Alloting Shares While Restrained from Exercising Rights on Shares Amount to Wilful Disobedience.

The appeal arose from Suit No.3121 of 2004, where the appellants (original plaintiffs, Gopal L. Raheja & Anr.) claimed that the respondents (original ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Probate to Deceased Wife's Will in Testamentary Suit Filed by Husband. Sons' Allegations of Forgery, Undue Influence, and Mutual Will Irrevocability Fail; Court Holds Due Execution Proved Under Indian Succession Act, 1925.

The plaintiff, husband of the deceased Vilasgauri Manilal Doshi, filed a testamentary suit seeking probate of his wife’s will dated 15 April 1970. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Writ Petitions Against Land Acquisition Notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout; Petitioners Seek Quashing of Preliminary and Final Notifications Under BDA Act, 1976.

Multiple writ petitions were filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various landowners challenging land acquisition proceedi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Overrules Res Judicata Objection in Admiralty Limitation Suit; Prior Withdrawal of Application Before Chinese Court Does Not Bar Fresh Suit Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The dispute arose from a voyage of the vessel M.V. YURIY ARSHENEVSKIY, owned by Murmansk Shipping Company, a Russian entity, which was chartered to ca...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Compromise Between Plaintiffs and Defendant Nos.8-11 in Property Suit — Consent Terms Accepted Despite Objections from Other Defendants. Partial Settlement Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC Does Not Affect Rights of Non-Settling Defendants Who May Continue to Contest the Suit.

The suit was filed by 35 plaintiffs seeking a declaration that they are purchasers of certain property. The matter was listed for settlement as the pl...