Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act"

554 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 554 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 — Held That Notice Under Section 116(2) Is Not a Condition Precedent for Reassessment Under Section 116(1).

5 Dec 2025

The petitioners, owners of a property in Baramati, challenged the reassessment of property tax by the Baramati Nagar Parishad. The property was origin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition for Lapsing of Land Reservation Under MRTP Act — Failure to Acquire Within Statutory Period. Land Gat No.27/3 reserved as Play Ground in Jalgaon Development Plan declared free from reservation due to non-completion of acquisition within ten years under Section 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

23 Jan 2024

The petitioners, Prabhakar Ramdas Kale and others, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Aurangabad seeking a declaration that their l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Section 51 Notice in MRTP Act Case — Development Rights Not Extinguished by Lapse of Permission. Held that a notice under Section 51 of the Maharashtra Regional Town Planning Act, 1966 cannot be issued for alleged breach of conditions when the development permission had already lapsed and the petitioner had acquired vested rights under a development agreement.

6 Oct 2022

The petitioner, Galore Developers Private Limited, entered into an agreement on 23 March 2010 with the Solapur Municipal Corporation (respondent nos.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Strikes Down Rule 44(1)(i) of Maharashtra Registration Rules, 1961 as Ultra Vires Registration Act, 1908. Circular requiring NOC from Gram Panchayat for registration of sale deeds quashed for lack of statutory authority.

5 May 2022

The petitioners, three individuals, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging Rule 44(1)(i) of the Maharashtra ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Quash Order Refusing FIR Registration in Environmental Violation Case — Section 19 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Bars Private Complaints Without Government Sanction. The court held that Section 19 does not bar police from registering an FIR, but the applicant's complaint lacked specific allegations of violation of the Act or rules.

22 Oct 2019

The applicant, Pratap Lal Teli, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an order pass...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 129(2) of MRTP Act in Land Acquisition Compensation Case. Court holds that interest under Section 129(2) is payable only from the date of possession if compensation is paid within three years, otherwise from the date of award.

3 Aug 2017

The petitioners' land was acquired under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 (MRTP Act) by the Municipal Council, Pusad. Possession w...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowners' Petition in MRTP Act Purchase Notice Case - Deemed Lapse of Reservation Upheld. Amendment to Section 127(1) Enlarging Period for Acquisition Steps Does Not Apply to Purchase Notices Served Before Amendment, as Right to Lapse Had Already Accrued.

22 Dec 2016

The petitioners, owners of 0.54 hectares of land in Pusad, had their land reserved for a primary school under the final development plan published on ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in MRTP Act Case — Notice Under Section 53(1) Challenged as Nullity for Shortfall in Statutory Period. Bar Under Section 149 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 Does Not Apply When Notice Itself Is Invalid Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Period.

20 Jan 2015

The appellant, Kishor S/o Ramalu Telang, was the original plaintiff who received a notice dated 18.11.2010 under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Challenging Entrustment of Playground Land to Samiti for Development and Maintenance. Municipal Corporation's Decision to Entrust Land on Caretaker Basis for Playground Construction Upheld as Valid Exercise of Discretion Under Section 63 of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966.

23 Feb 2006

The appellants, Sarvajanik Shri Ganeshotsav Mandal and its president Sanjay Sawant, filed an appeal against the dismissal of their writ petition by a ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Withdrawal of Writ Petition in Municipal Corporation Dispute — Petitioner Seeks to Pursue Alternative Remedy Before Civil Court. Court permits withdrawal with liberty to file civil suit, holding that pendency of writ petition does not bar civil remedy.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Jhalak Constructions through its partners Naresh Harumal Wadhwani and Sagar Mukesh Wadhwani, filed a writ petition before the Bombay ...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)