Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

562 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 562 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order Directing Employer to Bear Advocate Costs for Workmen in Domestic Enquiry — MRTU & PULP Act, 1971 — Held that Industrial Court exceeded jurisdiction by imposing financial burden on employer without legal basis.

The petitioners, M/s. Esdee Paints Ltd. and its directors, challenged an order dated 16.08.2016 passed by the Industrial Court, Thane, in Revision App...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition Against Industrial Court Order on Subsistence Allowance Payment. Subsistence Allowance Payable Only During Suspension Period, Not After Dismissal Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, M/s. Pravi Auto Swing Pvt Ltd., challenged the judgment and order dated 21-3-2016 passed by the Learned Member of the Industrial Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Direction to Consider Clerical Post for Mazdoors Under Kalelkar Award. Unfair Labour Practice Found as Employer Failed to Disprove Employees' Claim of Performing Clerk Duties Despite Appointment as Mazdoors.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Superintending Engineer, Nagpur Irrigation Circle, and the State of Maharashtra challenging an order of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Industrial Court Order in Promotion Dispute Due to Non-Joinder of Affected Parties. Seniority-Based Promotion Claim Fails as Persons Promoted in Supersession Were Not Impleaded as Respondents Under MRTU and PULP Act.

The petitioner, Parmatma Ek Sevak Nagarik Sahakari Bank, challenged the judgment and order dated 27.08.2008 passed by the Industrial Court in Complain...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Upholds Finding of Unfair Labour Practice in Layoff Case but Remands for Determination of Back Wages. Employer's Failure to Pay Layoff Compensation Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under Item 9 Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Cylinders (Pvt.) Ltd., an industry engaged in manufacturing gas cylinders at Kalmeshwar, Nagpur, challenged the order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions of Sweepers Challenging Termination Without Inquiry. Termination of daily-wage sweepers by Municipal Council set aside for violation of Model Standing Orders and principles of natural justice.

The petitioners, Ram Pyarelal Khicher and Sunita Raju Paisadeli, were employed as sweepers by the Municipal Council, Ramtek. Ram was appointed on 8.12...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Petition Challenging Reinstatement of Pharmacists in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of daily-wage pharmacists appointed through proper selection held to be unfair labour practice under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971, and reinstatement with back wages upheld.

The State of Maharashtra and its officers (petitioners) filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Labour Court dated 25-8-2000 in Complaint (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Interim Stay on Transfer Orders in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Transfer of Workmen During Pendency of Industrial Disputes Constitutes Prima Facie Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act.

The petitioner, Bajaj Auto Limited, challenged an interim order dated 23rd December 2005 passed by the Industrial Court, Pune, in Complaint (ULP) No.4...