Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "MRTU & PULP Act, 1971"

522 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 522 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Workmen's Restoration Application in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint Against Bajaj Auto Limited. Industrial Court's Rejection on Merits Set Aside, Matter Remanded for Fresh Consideration.

19 Jan 2018

The judgment concerns two writ petitions arising from an order dated 19.01.2011 passed by the Industrial Court, Aurangabad. The petitioners in Writ Pe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reference Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act at Instance of Unrecognized Union. Contract Labour Workmen Can Raise Industrial Dispute Through Any Union, Recognized or Not, Under Section 10(1) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

14 Jun 2010

The petitioner, Bharat Forge Limited, a company engaged in manufacturing forgings, challenged the validity of a reference made by the Additional Commi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Interim Order in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint — Ex-gratia Denial to Striking Employees Amounts to Unfair Labour Practice. Denial of Ex-gratia Payment to Employees Who Participated in Strike While Granting to Non-Strikers Violates Item 5 of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971.

2 Dec 2011

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai (the Corporation) and its Municipal Commissioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constituti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSEDCL Petitions Challenging Labour Court Awards in Retrenchment Compensation Cases. Employer's Failure to Pay Full Wages and Notice Pay Under Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Renders Retrenchment Invalid.

26 Feb 2015

The Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. (MSEDCL) filed five writ petitions challenging separate awards of the Labour Court, Dhule,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Cross-Petitions Against Labour Court Awards Awarding Compensation to Workmen Dismissed After Strike; Maintainability of Reference Under Industrial Disputes Act and Proportionality of Punishment Examined.

20 Feb 2014

The matter involved cross writ petitions arising from Labour Court awards concerning the dismissal of workmen employed by Haldyn Glass Limited. In the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of 77 Employees Seeking Permanency Against Nagpur Municipal Corporation — Seasonal Workers Not Entitled to Automatic Permanent Status Under Model Standing Orders. The Court held that the burden of proving continuous service of 240 days in the preceding year was not discharged and the employer's classification of workers as seasonal was not arbitrary.

22 Mar 2006

The petitioners, 77 employees of the Nagpur Municipal Corporation, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 13.12.1994 of the Industrial Cour...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Challenge to Reference of Industrial Dispute Despite 14-Year Delay — Delay Alone Does Not Extinguish Existence of Dispute Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The Court held that the appropriate Government must form an opinion on existence of dispute, but adequacy of material is not justiciable, and all contentions including delay can be raised before the Labour Court.

23 Jul 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a batch of writ petitions filed by an employer challenging the order of Reference made by the Additional Commissioner ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)

30 Aug 2006

Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Employer Challenging Industrial Court's Order Granting Permanency to Contract Labourers. Employer-Employee Relationship Established Despite Contractor Deployment Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

29 Jan 2016

The petitioner, M/s Uni Klinger Ltd., challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court, Ahmednagar dated 28.08.2003, which allowed complaints filed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Workers Challenging Industrial Court Order Refusing Stay of Union Election. Held that the Industrial Court's order was not perverse and did not suffer from any jurisdictional error, and the writ court's supervisory jurisdiction did not warrant interference.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by 25 workers (appellants) against an order of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dismissing thei...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)