Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Consideration of Bail and Lack of Compelling Reasons. Detenu's Release on Bail in Multiple FIRs Not Considered, Rendering Subjective Satisfaction Invalid Under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

1 Oct 2025

The petitioner, father of the detenu Yash Vijay Sashte, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging a detention o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under M.P.A.D. Act for Lack of Proximity Between Offences and Public Order. Detenu's Criminal Acts Were Against Individuals, Not Society at Large, Failing the Test of 'Public Order' Under Section 2(b-1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

12 Sep 2025

The petitioner, Ganesh Bharat Giri, aged 23, challenged an order of preventive detention dated 11.05.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed unde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Atrocities Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Caste-Based Intent. Appellant's involvement in murder conspiracy not established by direct evidence; bail granted under Section 14-A(2) of SC/ST Act.

13 Feb 2023

The appellant, Akshay Atmaram Rathod, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A(2) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atroci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order in Dangerous Person Case Due to Non-Application of Mind Regarding Bail Status. Preventive detention under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as detaining authority failed to consider that detenu was on bail in all four criminal cases, vitiating subjective satisfaction.

21 Dec 2020

The petitioner, Sunil Pandharinath Dhotre, challenged a detention order dated 11/2/2020 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nashik, detaining him fo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unreasonable Delay. Court holds that reliance on fabricated offences and lack of live link between alleged activities and detention order vitiates preventive detention.

18 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Anil s/o Ramesh Manglani, challenged a detention order dated 21.09.2016 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Nagpur City under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Quashing Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA for Procedural Violations. Non-Supply of Documents and Delay in Considering Representation Renders Detention Invalid.

22 Dec 2014

The petitioner, Shri Mohammed Tanveer Pariyani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a writ of Habeas Corpus to quash t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Reasons — Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Procedural Safeguards Not Satisfied

23 Jul 2012

The petitioner, Baban Prakash Ranware, challenged a detention order dated 14.2.2012 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune under Section 3(1) of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Detention Order Under MPDA Act — Non-Specification of Detention Period Not Fatal. Order of detention under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 not vitiated merely because period of detention not mentioned, following Supreme Court's overruling of Gurubux Bhiryani in T. Devaki.

20 Jan 2006

The petitioner, Sk. Israil Sk. Babbu, was detained by an order dated 26.2.2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Amravati, under Section 3(1) of t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Inordinate Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The court held that a delay of about 82 days in deciding the detenu's representation without any explanation vitiates the detention order under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords Bootleggers Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

24 Aug 2005

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Mohammed Taki Ahmed Ali Chunara @ Mohammed Islam Mohammed Ali Shaikh, challenged the detention order passed by the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Detention Under MPDA Act — Preventive Detention Upheld as Legally Valid. Court holds that subjective satisfaction of detaining authority based on credible material is sufficient and not vitiated by delay in disposal of representation.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a criminal writ petition filed by 23 petitioners challenging their detention under the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activitie...

22 23 24 25

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)