Search Results for "Lease and Purchase Option"

260 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 260 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding Up Petition Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956 for Debt Disputed in Good Faith. Petition Filed to Exert Pressure for Unreasonable Demands, Not for Recovery of Genuine Debt.

The petitioner, Fomento Resorts And Hotels Ltd., filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 against the respondent, G...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Admission of Winding-Up Petition Against Telecom Company Due to Substratum Erosion and Deadlock. Cancellation of 2G Licences and Irreconcilable Differences Between Equal Shareholders Justify Winding-Up Under Section 433(f) of the Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal arose from an order of the company judge admitting a petition for winding up of Etisalat D.B. Telecom Limited (the company) under Section 4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition as Foreign Company Failed to Comply with Registration Requirements Under Sections 592 and 599 of Companies Act, 1956. Petitioner, a foreign company with a place of business in India, cannot maintain a winding-up petition without registering under the Act.

The petitioner, Willis Europe B.V., a company incorporated under the laws of the Netherlands with its principal place of business in the United Kingdo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officers in SARFAESI Act Loan Recovery Dispute. Civil Nature of Transaction Precludes Criminal Prosecution Under Sections 406, 409, 420 IPC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by K. Virupaksha and another, who were Deputy General Managers of Canara Bank, against the order of the Kar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11(a) CPC — Cause of Action Disclosed. Plaint Cannot Be Rejected Merely Because Judge Thinks Plaintiff May Not Succeed; Defence Not Material at This Stage.

The appeal arises from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court rejecting the plaint under Order VII Rule 11(a) of the Code of Ci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Rejection of Plaint in Trust Dispute for Non-Compliance with Section 50 of Bombay Public Trust Act, 1950. Suit by devotees challenging removal of deity held barred without Charity Commissioner's consent.

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by defendant trustees (defendant Nos. 1, 3, 4, and 5) in a suit seeking rejection of the plaint under Order...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CERA Audit Notice for Lack of Statutory Basis. Audit of Private Company's Records for Pre-GST and GST Periods Without Invoking Specific Statutory Provision Held Without Jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Kiran Gems Private Limited, a private limited company, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...