Search Results for "Kerala Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Kerala Act"

3933 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3933 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against DIC and Sales Tax Department for Refusing Transfer of Property Purchased in SARFAESI Auction — Auction Purchaser Not Liable for Previous Owner's Sales Tax Dues. The court held that the auction purchaser under the SARFAESI Act acquires clear title free from prior encumbrances, and the DIC cannot insist on NOC from Sales Tax for transfer of property.

18 Feb 2021

The petitioner, Medineutrina Pvt. Ltd., purchased an immovable property (plot no.206, MIDC, Butibori, Nagpur) in an auction conducted by Punjab Nation...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Order in SARFAESI Act Matter — One Time Settlement Not Binding as Bank Did Not Accept Offer. Court Held That Mere Submission of OTS Proposal Does Not Create Binding Contract; Bank's Rejection Valid.

8 Jul 2024

The petitioners, borrowers of the respondent bank, challenged the order dated 22.09.2022 passed by the Debt Recovery Tribunal-I, Bangalore in Diary No...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Reference in Corruption Case: Demand Must Be Proved by Direct or Circumstantial Evidence, Not Mere Recovery. Proof of demand is sine qua non for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and presumption under Section 20 arises only after demand is established.

15 Dec 2022

This reference to a Constitution Bench of the Supreme Court arose from a conflict between three-judge bench decisions regarding the proof of demand of...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds Section 143-A of Negotiable Instruments Act Directory — Interim Compensation Requires Recording of Reasons. Court clarifies that Section 143-A is not mandatory and reasons must be recorded for quantum under Section 143-A(2).

7 Jul 2022

The judgment arises from two criminal writ petitions filed by Ashwin Ashokrao Karokar (accused) against Laxmikant Govind Joshi (complainant) under the...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Multiple FIRs Under UP Conversion Act and IPC for Lack of Prima Facie Case and Procedural Non-Compliance. FIRs Filed by Third Party Not Authorized Under Unamended Section 4 of the Act and Vague Allegations of Fraud and Conversion Do Not Constitute Offences; Court Emphasizes Misuse of Criminal Machinery and Importance of Protecting Religious Freedom.

1 Jan 1970

The present batch of matters comprised three writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution and nine appeals by special leave against orders of t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Proceedings in Murder Conspiracy Case — Prima Facie Case of Fabricated Alibi Established. Police Officers Allegedly Created Bogus Excise Case to Shield Murder Accused, High Court Erred in Quashing Under Section 482 CrPC.

13 Dec 2024

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals filed by the appellant, Om Prakash Yadav, against the judgment of the Allahabad High Court which had quashed cri...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Division Bench Considers Revenue's Appeal Against Single Judge's Order Quashing Penalty Notices Under Section 271DA on Limitation Grounds. Issue Pertains to Interpretation of Section 275 of Income Tax Act in Cases Where Penalty Is to Be Imposed by an Authority Other Than the Assessing Officer.

7 Jul 2026

The appeals arose from orders passed by a single judge of the High Court of Karnataka in ten writ petitions. The respondents, individual assessees and...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Refers to Three-Judge Bench the Question Whether Quantity of Mixture or Pure Drug Content Determines Punishment Under NDPS Act. The Court Held That E. Micheal Raj Requires Reconsideration as It Omitted Note 2 of Notification and the Scheme of the Act Treating Preparations as a Whole.

22 Apr 2020

The Supreme Court, in a reference arising from multiple appeals and writ petitions, considered the correctness of the decision in E. Micheal Raj v. In...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)