Search Results for "Illegal gratification"

456 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Tehsildar in Land Settlement Case — Unexplained Delay of 14 Years and Absence of Extraneous Influence Render Chargesheet Unsustainable. Quasi-Judicial Officer Cannot Be Disciplined for a Wrong Order Without Allegations of Misconduct or Bribery.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Division Bench of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh which reversed a Single Judge's order quashing a chargeshe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Penalty of Dismissal Substituted by Compulsory Retirement in Disciplinary Proceeding — State Challenges Tribunal's Modification of Punishment for Misconduct by Typist.

The State of Karnataka and its authorities filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 04.01.2018...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Termination of Clerk in Unfair Labour Practice Case Due to Perverse Finding by Labour Court. Industrial Court's Reversal of Reinstatement Order Confirmed as Labour Court Ignored Evidence of Demand for Illegal Gratification.

The Petitioner, Suresh Vasudeo Dalvi, was employed as a Clerk with Respondent Nos. 1 and 2, a Trust running an auditorium named 'Kalidas Natyagruha'. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Charge Memo in Disciplinary Proceedings for Vagueness and Ambiguity. Charge Memo Based on ACB Trap and Arrest Found to Lack Specifics and Violate Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, an Assistant Revenue Officer with BBMP, challenged a charge memorandum dated 16.11.2019 issued by the Deputy Commissioner (Admin), BBM...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Uttam Ramaji Shere, was a public servant working with the Mahatma Fule Backward Development Corporation, Akola. He was convicted by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Patwari in Bribery Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Contradictory Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) Read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Dattatraya Udaji Warkad, a Patwari, was convicted by the Special Court, Buldhana, for offences under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Corroboration and Inconsistent Evidence. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Purushottam Vasant Joshi, was a Maintenance Supervisor in the Taluka Inspector of Land Records office at Miraj. He was convicted by the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Illegal Building Collapse Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Culpable Homicide and Long Incarceration. Court Held That Section 304 IPC Requires Knowledge of Likely Death, Which Was Not Established Against the Applicants.

The judgment concerns three bail applications filed by accused persons arrested in connection with the collapse of an illegally constructed building i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Ashwin Chintaman Shambharkar, was convicted by the Special Judge, Nagpur in Special Case No. 18 of 1997 for offences under Section 7 an...