Search Results for "IPC Sections 406 and 420"

463 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 463 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Franchise Dispute: Breach of Contract Not Cheating Without Fraudulent Intent. Essential Ingredients of Sections 420 and 406 IPC Not Made Out as Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature.

The applicants, directors of AN Retail Ventures Private Limited (ANR), sought quashing of FIR No.134/2021 registered at Osmanpura Police Station, Aura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in SC/ST Act Case by Setting Aside High Court's Remand Order and Upholding Cognizance. Cognizance Order Under Section 204 CrPC Does Not Require Detailed Reasons as Magistrate Applied Mind to Case Diary and Record, Making Remand Unnecessary.

The appeal arose from a criminal case involving allegations under the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and the Scheduled Castes and the Scheduled Tribes (Preve...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Grants Bail to Accused in DJ Halli Mob Lynching Case Citing Parity and No Prima Facie Involvement in Murder. Petitioners accused of rioting and arson under Sections 435, 436 IPC and SC/ST Act granted bail as co-accused similarly placed were already enlarged on bail.

The judgment pertains to two criminal petitions filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking bail for the petitioner...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside Anticipatory Bail in Forgery and Cheating Case Involving Forged Sale Deed of Senior Citizens' Land. Court Holds That Anticipatory Bail Cannot Be Granted as a Matter of Routine When Prima Facie Case of Serious Economic Offences Involving Forgery of Documents Is Made Out.

The case involves an appeal by Pratibha Manchanda and another (the appellants) against the State of Haryana and another (respondents) challenging the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Dishonour of Cheque Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations and Non-Impleadment of Company. Vicarious liability under Section 141 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 requires specific averments and company must be made accused.

The petitioners, Harry Inder Dhaul, Narayan Singh Pathania, and Mikhail s/o Harry Dhaul, were directors of Siddhayu Ayurvedic Research Foundation Priv...