Search Results for "Grandmother"

467 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 467 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition Due to Unexplained Delay in Preventive Detention Order. Delay of 37 Days Between Arrest and Detention Order Snaps Live and Proximate Link, Rendering Detention Invalid Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982.

The petitioner, Chinaponnu, grandmother of the detenu Vijay, filed a Habeas Corpus Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Rape in Circumstantial Evidence Case — Chain of Circumstances Complete and Inconsistent with Innocence of Accused. Last Seen, Motive, Recovery of Stolen Articles, and DNA Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 376, 449, 394 IPC.

The appellant, Mohamed Sameer Khan, was convicted by the Second Additional Sessions Judge, Special Court for Bomb Blast Case, Coimbatore, on 17.11.201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Grandson in Murder of 82-Year-Old Grandmother over Property Dispute. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, Extra-Judicial Confession, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Convict Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sagar Dwarkanath Patil, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code for the murder of his 82-year-old grandmother, Smt. Pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault and Kidnapping of Minor Girl. Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Sufficient to Prove Offences Under Sections 5(1) and 6 of POCSO Act and Sections 363, 366A, 376 of IPC.

The appellant, Rupesh Parasram Nehare, was convicted by the Special Judge, Warora in Special (POCSO) Case No. 05 of 2015 for offences under Section 5(...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant in Rape of Minor Case Under POCSO Act — Victim's Testimony and Medical Evidence Found Credible. The court held that the delay in FIR was explained and the appellant's false implication theory was not supported by evidence.

The appellant, Samadhan Kashiram Khirodkar, was convicted by the Ad hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Khamgaon, in Sessions Trial No.92/2015 for offences...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Possession Dispute — Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession Upheld. Court holds that no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC when findings of fact are based on evidence and not perverse.

The case involves a property dispute between two brothers, Gulab (plaintiff) and Ajab (defendant no.2), over a building constructed on Municipal Plot ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against In-Laws in Dowry Harassment Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. General and Omnibus Allegations Against Distant Relatives and Married Sisters Not Sufficient to Sustain Charges Under Section 498-A IPC.

The present application was filed by the original accused persons (applicants) under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Rash Driving Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by the accused, Puttaiah @ Mahesh, challenging his conviction under Sections 279 and 304A of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Wife's Appeal in Divorce Case — Sets Aside Family Court's Dismissal of Maintenance Petition. Wife entitled to interim maintenance under Section 24 of Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 despite husband's claim of unemployment.

The appellant-wife, Smt. Sreelakshmi, married the respondent-husband, Sri Lakshminarayan S Hegde, on 9-12-2010. The wife had no parents and was brough...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Partition Suit — Property Acquired by Father-in-Law Not Joint Family Property. Daughter-in-law cannot claim share in property purchased by father-in-law in name of son as it is not ancestral or joint family property under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the second defendant against the judgment and decree of the trial court in a partition suit. The pla...