Search Results for "Goods Vehicle"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Goods Vehicle"

657 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 657 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Gratuitous Passenger in Goods Vehicle Not Entitled to Compensation. Claimant traveling as gratuitous passenger in goods vehicle cannot be considered owner of goods; insurer not liable under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

3 May 2023

The case involves an appeal by United India Insurance Company Ltd. against the award of compensation by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Palghar, i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Appeal Against CESTAT Order Waiving Late Fees for Delayed Bill of Entry Filing. Late Fee Under Section 46(3) of Customs Act, 1962 Is Mandatory and Not Discretionary for Delayed Filing Beyond Prescribed Period.

26 Jul 2022

The Principal Commissioner of Customs, Pune, filed an appeal under Section 130 of the Customs Act, 1962 against the final order of the Customs, Excise...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order Classifying Motor-home Under CTH 87.02. Settlement Commission Has Jurisdiction to Interpret Tariff Classification Under Customs Act, 1962.

8 Jul 2022

The Union of India filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 28.07.2008 passed by the Customs and Central Excise Settlement Commission, Additio...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Owner's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable Despite Vehicle Used for Hire or Reward. Breach of Policy Condition Not Fundamental as Vehicle Was a 'Tempo Trax' Used for Occasional Conveyance of Passengers, Not a Goods Carriage.

13 Dec 2019

The case involves two appeals filed by the owner of a Tempo Trax (vehicle No. MH-31/G-6545) against awards passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribuna...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Insurance Company's Pay and Recover Liability in Motor Accident Claim — Truck Driver's Negligence Proved, Insurer Must Pay Compensation and Recover from Owner/Driver. The court affirmed the principle that an insurer is liable to pay compensation to third parties even if the insured is at fault, with the right to recover from the insured.

13 Nov 2017

The case involves an appeal by United India Insurance Company Ltd. against the judgment and award dated 02-04-2014 passed by the Motor Accident Claims...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Dependents of Deceased Cleaners in Workmen's Compensation Cases. Computation of monthly wages corrected to maximum under Section 4(1)(a) of Workmen's Compensation Act, 1926, leading to enhanced awards.

3 Jun 2016

The judgment pertains to multiple appeals filed under Section 30(1) of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1926, against the order dated 28-04-2009 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIRs Under Essential Commodities Act for Non-Essential Commodities. Wheat and Rice Seized by Rationing Authorities Held Not Covered Under Essential Commodities Act, 1955 or Control Orders.

8 Aug 2013

The petitioners, including M/s. Ace International, Pankaj Pranjibhai Thakkar, and M/s. Metro International, filed three writ petitions challenging the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Transport Commissioner's Order in Vehicle Tax Dispute. Petitioner failed to prove vehicle was not used after accident, and tax liability under Motor Vehicles Act was upheld.

29 Apr 2011

The petitioner, Sudhakar Madhavrao Patil, owned a Leyland Truck No. MTS 9563, which he used for transportation of goods. He claimed to have purchased ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in VAT Classification of Electric Bicycle — EBikeMatrix Held to Be a Bicycle Under Schedule Entry C14 of MVAT Act, 2002. The court held that a bicycle with an auxiliary electric motor of less than 0.5 KW and battery backup is a 'bicycle' under Entry C14, taxable at 4%, not 12.5%.

6 May 2010

The appellant, M/s R.K. Rim Pvt. Ltd., a manufacturer of bicycles, started producing a product called 'EBikeMatrix', which is a bicycle with an auxili...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Held that where the deceased was a pillion rider on a motorcycle driven by a third party, the insurer of the offending vehicle is liable only to the extent of its insured's negligence, and contributory negligence must be apportioned.

30 Nov -0001

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the legal representatives of a deceased person who died in a road accident. The deceased was a pi...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)