Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund Scheme"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Enhances Child Maintenance and Grants Interim Medical Maintenance ...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...

Search Results for "Employees' Provident Fund Scheme"

452 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 452 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Amalgamation Scheme of PMC Bank Under Section 45 of Banking Regulation Act, 1949. Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Fundamental Rights or Procedural Irregularities; Scheme Upheld as Serving Public Interest and Depositor Protection.

9 Mar 2026

The judgment deals with seven writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court challenging a Notification dated 25 January 2022 issued by the Ministr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Ex-Promoters' Gratuity Claims, Holds Directors in Control Not 'Employees' Under Payment of Gratuity Act. Founders who were in absolute control of company affairs cannot claim gratuity as employees despite drawing salary, as they fall outside the definition of 'employee' under Section 2(e) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

20 Aug 2024

The petitioners, Anil Govind Ganu and Ashwini Anil Ganu, were the founders and directors of Innovative Technomics Pvt. Ltd. They claimed gratuity for ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Attachment Order Passed by Executing Court in Execution Case Involving Gratuity Amount. Gratuity Payable Under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Held Exempt from Attachment Under Section 13 Even After Death of Employee.

23 Jul 2026

The present writ petition was filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 03.06.2021 passed by the Principal Civi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Application for Quashing Summons in Security Guards Act Violation. Allegations Against Officers as Principal Employers Prima Facie Disclose Offence Under Clause 42 of Maharashtra Private Security Guards Scheme, 2002.

10 May 2013

The matter arose from a criminal complaint filed by Inspector R.D. Khanorkar under the Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Regulation of Employment a...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Contempt Petitions Against WPL in Super Bazar Revival Case — No Willful Disobedience of Orders Found. Revival Scheme Implemented Under Court Supervision; Payments Made as Directed.

5 Mar 2020

The judgment pertains to contempt petitions filed against M/s Writers and Publishers Pvt. Ltd. (WPL) alleging willful disobedience of court orders in ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Correctness of Century Textile Interpretation on 'Unprotected Worker' Under Maharashtra Mathadi Act. Referred Question Seeks to Determine Whether Only Casually Engaged Workers Are Covered by the Act Under Section 2(11).

30 Aug 2006

The Bombay High Court Full Bench was constituted to resolve a conflict arising from differing interpretations of Section 2(11) of the Maharashtra Math...

High Court

Bombay High Court Full Bench Examines Reference on Whether Mathadi Act Applies Only to Casually Engaged Workers; Considers Statutory Definition of Unprotected Worker Under Section 2(11)

30 Aug 2006

Background: A group of writ petitions were filed before the Bombay High Court by various employers including Kay Kay Embroideries P. Ltd., Bhulwalka S...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Directs Successor States to Pay Employees of State-Owned Corporations Following Bifurcation Under Bihar Reorganisation Act, 2000 — Prolonged Non-Payment Violates Right to Livelihood Under Article 21.

1 Jan 2026

The present writ petition was filed by the Bihar State Ardh Sarkari Arajpati Karamchari Maha Sangh and others, representing thousands of employees of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Certificate in Industrial Dispute Over Bonus Calculation. Court holds that Section 33-C(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 cannot be used to adjudicate disputed claims requiring determination of entitlement, and that the Authority exceeded its jurisdiction by computing bonus amounts without a prior adjudication of rights.

17 Nov 2025

The Bombay High Court allowed a writ petition filed by Pawan Hans Limited challenging an order dated 27 June 2022 passed by the Authority under Sectio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Corporation's Challenge to Reinstatement of Employees in Industrial Dispute. Termination of Employees Without Compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Held Illegal and Reinstatement with Back Wages Upheld.

30 Nov -0001

This batch of writ petitions arises from a common dispute between the Maharashtra State Handloom Corporation (the Corporation) and its employees. The ...

22 23 24 25 26

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)